期刊文献+

前列腺癌筛查患者的临床病理特点及其意义 被引量:2

Mass screening prostate cancer and clinical comparison
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过分析集团筛查和临床诊断发现的前列腺癌,探讨前列腺癌筛查的临床价值。方法2000年1月至2008年1月共收治441例前列腺癌患者,分为两组,临床组为门诊收治的前列腺癌患者122例;筛查组为同期23183名50岁以上男性人群筛查发现的前列腺癌患者319例(均住院治疗);对两组患者年龄、直肠指检阳性率、血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、病理Gleason评分、分型及临床分期和治疗方法等进行比较。结果筛查组直肠指检阳性率为42.0%,低于临床组的79.5%。筛查组中PSA〉20.0μg/L的比例低于临床组。筛查组的中度分化腺癌占61.8%,高于临床组的29.5%,而低分化腺癌则相反。筛查组低于他的患者比例为56.1%,T3以上患者比例为43.9%;临床组低于T2的患者比例为25.4%,T3队七患者比例为74.6%。发生局部及远处转移患者,筛查组26.0%,临床组46.0%。临床组根治性前列腺切除术占9.8%;筛查组根治手术占18.2%。结论人群中筛查前列腺癌可以发现早期局限无症状的前列腺癌。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of the mass screening by analyzing the features of prostate cancer between mass screening patients and clinical patients. Methods From January 2000 to January 2008, 441 cases of prostate cancer ( including 122 patients from clinical diagnosis and 319 patients from mass screening 23 183 men who were more than 50 years old) were analyzed from age, digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and range, the Gleason's score and grade, clinical staging and therapy. Results 42. 0% of mass screening patients were inspected by DRE, it was lower than that (79. 5% ) in the clinical patients. The percent of patients with serum PSA levels of less than 10. 0 μg/L in mass screening group was higher than in clinical group, while the percent of patients with serum PSA levels of more than 20. 0 μg/L in mass screening group was lower than in clinical group. The percent of moderately differentiated degree of prostate cancer in mass screening group was higher than in clinical group, but it was on the contrary for poorly differentiated degree of prostate cancer . The percent of T1-2 prostate cancers in mass screening group was 56.1%, which was higher than 25.4% in clinical group. While, the percent of 33-4 tumors in mass screening group was lower than in clinical group. The percent of men undergoing radical prostatectomy in mass screening group was 18.2% , which was higher than 9. 8% in clinical group. The percent of men of locally advanced and far metastasis in mass screening group was 26. 0% , while was lower than 46. 0% in clinical group. Conclusion General investigation for prostate cancer is benefit to find asymptomatic cancer of early stage.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第10期734-736,共3页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 普查 诊断 Prostatic neoplasms Mass screening Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Gronberg H. Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet, 2003,361 : 859-864.
  • 2刘振伟,项永兵,张薇,方茹蓉,阮志贤,孙璐,高立峰,金凡,高玉堂.上海市区1973~1999年前列腺癌发病趋势分析[J].中国卫生统计,2003,20(6):335-337. 被引量:32
  • 3Moul JW, Sesterhenn IA, Connelly RR, et al. Prostate-specific antigen values at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis in Mrican- American men. JAMA, 1995,274 : 1277-1281.
  • 4Peyromaure M, Debre B, Mao K, et al. Management of prostate cancer in China:amuhicenter report of 6 institutions. J Urol,2005, 174 : 1794-1797.
  • 5Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol, 1989,142: 66-70.
  • 6Loch AC, Bannowsky A, Baeurle L, et al. Technical and anatomical essentials for transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. World J Urol, 2007,25 : 361-366.
  • 7Yang JC, Tang J, Li J, et al. Contrast-enhanced gray-scale transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in men with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen levels. Acad Radiol, 2008, 15: 1291-1297.
  • 8Ten-is MK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsies. J Urol, 1992,148:829-832.
  • 9Shirley SE, Escoffery CT, Sargeant LA, et al. Clinieopathological features of prostate cancer in Jamaican men. BJU Int, 2002,89 : 390-395.
  • 10Salirrosas SV, Armborgo J, Mostacero M. Clinical correlation, ecographic and levels of prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer. Acta Chir Iugosl,2005,52 : 13-17.

二级参考文献9

  • 1项永兵,金凡,陈浩泉,周淑贞,陶蓉芳,程爱清,方茹蓉,孙璐,高立峰,高玉堂.上海市区1988年─1991年肿瘤患者生存率分析[J].中国肿瘤,1996,5(11):6-8. 被引量:24
  • 2[3]Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program( www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER* Stat Database: Incidence-SEER 9 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2002 Sub (1973-2000), National Cancer Institute, DCCPS,Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2003, based on the November 2002 submission.
  • 3[5]Kenneth JP,Jo A J,Peggy SE. Epidemiology of prostate cancer:molecular and environmental clues. Urology.1996,48 (5):676-683.
  • 4[7]Gaxiano JM, Hennekens CH.Dietary fat and risk of prostate cancer(editorial).The Journal of National Cancer Institute,1995,87(19):1427-1428.
  • 5[8]Giovannucci E.Epidemiologic characteristics of prostate cancer.Cancer,1995,75(9):1766-1777.
  • 6[10]Hsing AW,Jie D, Sesterhenn IA,et al.Body size and prostate cancer:a population-based case-control study in China. Cancer Epidemiology,Biomarkers and Prevention, 2000, 9:1335-1341.
  • 7[2]Parkin DM, Whelan SL,Ferlay J, et al.Cancer incidence in five continents.Vol.Ⅶ.IARC.Sci.Publ,143,1997.
  • 8赵法伋,史奎雄,柳启沛,郭俊生.上海居民膳食结构的变化及食物金字塔[J].中国食物与营养,1997,3(3):27-29. 被引量:4
  • 9李星,郭红卫,许洁,柳启沛,陆瑞芳.上海市区居民的膳食营养状况及其对策[J].中国公共卫生,1998,14(9):561-563. 被引量:8

共引文献31

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部