期刊文献+

芬太尼对慢性吗啡耐受大鼠中脑导水管周围灰质μ受体与β-arrestin2表达的影响

Effect of fentanyl on expression of mu-receptor and β-arrestin 2 in periaqueductal gray of rats tolerant to morphine
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察芬太尼对慢性吗啡耐受大鼠中脑导水管周围灰质μ受体与β—arrestin2表达的影响。方法健康成年雄性SD大鼠40只,体重(230±20)g,随机分为5组(n=8):NS组(对照组):皮下注射生理盐水1ml/kg2次,间隔30min;M组(慢性吗啡耐受组):皮下注射吗啡10mg/kg,30min后皮下注射生理盐水1ml/kg;MF1、MF2、MF3组:吗啡用药同M组,注射吗啡30min后分别皮下注射芬太尼3、6、12μg/kg。各实验组每日给药2次,连续9d,给药后进行痛阈测定。断头处死大鼠,取中脑导水管周围灰质组织(PAG),逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT—PCR)方法测定μ受体、p-arrestin2的mRNA表达,免疫印迹(Westernblot)方法测定斗受体、β—arrestin2的蛋白表达。结果注射吗啡后,M组大鼠痛阈值明显高于NS组(P〈0.01),连续给药9天后,痛阈值降至给药前水平。与M组比较,MF2组与MF3组大鼠痛阈值下降趋缓,第7、9天,MF2组与MF3组痛阈值均高于M组(P〈0.05或0.01),MF1组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。与NS组比较,M组μ受体mRNA及其蛋白表达显著下调(P〈0.01);与M组比较,MF2组和MF3组μ受体mRNA及其蛋白表达上调(P〈0.05或0.01),MF1组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。M组β-arrestin2mRNA及其蛋白表达明显低于NS组(P〈0.01);MF2组和MF3组β—arrestin2mRNA及其蛋白表达高于M组(P〈0.05或0.01),而MFl组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论芬太尼6、12μg/kg通过上调慢性吗啡耐受大鼠PAG部位μ受体与IS-arrestin2表达,可增强吗啡镇痛作用,部分延缓慢性吗啡耐受产生。 Objective To investigate the effect of fentanyl upon the expression of mu-receptor and β-arrestin 2 in peri-aqueductal gray of morphine-tolerant rats. Methods Forty male SD rats weighing (230 ± 20) g were randomly divided into 5 groups of eight animals each: group NS, group M, group MF1, group MF2 and group MF3. Rats in group NS received only subcutaneous normal saline lml/kg twice a day for 9 consecutive days; group M received subcutaneous morphine 10 mg/kg followed by NS 1 ml/kg twice a day for 9 consecutive days; In groups MF1, MF2 and MF3, morphine 10 mg · kg-1 was injected subcutaneously followed by fentanyl 3, 6, 12p, g/kg respectively. All animals were sacrificed at Day 9 after measurement of pain threshold. Periaqueductal gray was removed for determination of the expression of mRNA (RT-PCR) and protein (Western-blot) of mu-receptor and β-arrestin 2. Results Compared with group NS, TFL of group M was significantly elevated after the first morphine injection ( P 〈 0. 01 ). But TFL of group M returned to the baseline value after chronic morphine treatment. Compared with group M, TFL increased in groups MF2 and MF3 at Days 7 and 9 ( P 〈 0. 05 or 0. 01 ). However, TFL of group MF1 was negative ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The expression of mu-receptor mRNA and protein was significantly lower in group M than in group NS (P 〈 0. 01 ). Compared with group M, the expressions of mu-receptor mRNA and protein were significantly elevated in group MF2 and MF3 (P 〈0. 05 or 0. 01 ) but there was no significant change in group MF1 (P 〉 0. 05). The expression of β-arrestin 2 mRNA and protein significantly decreased in group M as compared with group NS (P 〈0. 01 ). Compared with group M, the expressions of β- arrestin 2 mRNA and protein were significantly elevated in group MF2 and MF3 ( P 〈 0. 05 or 0. 01 ), but there was no significant change in group MF1 (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Fentayl at 6 and 12μg/kg can partly inhibit morphine tolerance through an increased expression of mu-receptor and β-arrestin 2 in periaqueductal gray of morphine-tolerant rats.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第19期1356-1360,共5页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 首都医学发展科研基金(20052057)
关键词 吗啡耐受 芬太尼 中脑导水管周围灰质 Μ受体 β-arrestin2 Morphine tolerance Fentanyl Periaqueductal gray Mu-receptor β-arrestin2
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Zhang J, Ferguson SS, Barak KS, et al. Role for G protein coupled receptor kinase in agonist-specific regulation of mu opioid receptor responsiveness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95: 7157- 7162.
  • 2Hashimoto T, Saito Y, Yamada K, et al. Enhancement of morphine analgesic effect with induction of mu-opioid receptor endocytosis in rats. Anesthesiology,2006, 105 : 574-580.
  • 3Lane DA, Patel PA, Morgan MM. Evidence for anintrinsic mecha- nism of antinoci ceptive tolerance within the ventrolateral periaqu-eductal gray of rats, Neuroscience, 2005, 135: 227- 234.
  • 4Cuan JS, Xu ZZ, Gao H, et al. Interaction with vesicle luminal prota chykinin regu- lates surface expression of delta-opioid receptors and opioid analgesia. Cell, 2005,122 : 6194531.
  • 5Whistler JL, Chuang HH, Chu P, et al. Functional dissociation of mu opioid receptor signaling and endocytosis: implications for the biology of opiate tolerance and addiction. Neuron, 1999,23: 737 -746.
  • 6Alvarez V, Arttamangkul S, Williams JT. A RAVE about opioid withdrawal. Neu- ron ,2001,32:761-763.
  • 7Whistler JL, von Zastrow M. Morphine-activated opioid receptorselude desensitization by beta-arrestin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998,95:9914-9919.
  • 8Koch T, Schulz S, Pfeiffer M, et al. C-terminal splice variants of the mouse mu~opioid receptor differ in morphine induced internalization and receptor resensitization. J Biol Chem, 2001, 276:31408-31414.
  • 9Schulz S, Mayer D, Pfeiffer M, et al. Morphine induces terminal mu-opioid recep- tor desensitization by sustained phosphorylation of serine-375. EMBO J 2004 ; 23 : 3282-3289.
  • 10Whistler JL, He Li, Fong J. Regulation of Opioid Receptor Traffic- king and Morphine Tolerance by Receptor Ohgomerization. Cell, 2003, 108:271-282.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部