期刊文献+

RECIST标准评价食管癌新辅助化疗疗效的可行性研究 被引量:5

Feasibility study on evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of esophageal cancer with RECIST criteria
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨运用REC IST标准评价食管癌新辅助化疗疗效的可行性。方法选择新辅助化疗食管癌患者。根据食管钡餐X线片显示病变长度,将食管病灶分为T1、T2、T3、T4期,CT扫描确定N、M分期。FLP方案化疗2个周期后,按照REC IST标准评价食管癌化疗疗效。结果68例患者中,Tl、T2、T3、T4期分别为2、31、24、11例,N0、N1期分别为12、56例。临床分期Ⅲ、Ⅳa及Ⅳb期分别为25、20、23例。化疗2个周期后评价疗效,CR 1例,PR 27例,SD 30例,PD 10例,RR为41%。结论RE-C IST标准能够评价食管癌新辅助化疗疗效,食管钡餐X线片显示病灶长度确定食管癌T分期,更适用于临床应用。 Aim To assess the feasibility of the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer with RECIST criteria. Methods The esophageal cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected. According to barium meal X -ray film,the primary lesion lengths in esophagus were divided into T1 ,T2 ,T3 and T4. The N and M stage was determined by CT scan. The response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria after 2 cycles of chemotherapy of FLP regimen. Results There were 2 cases for T1,31 cases for T2,24 cases for T3 and 11 cases for T4 and 12 for N0,56 for N1 among the 68 cases of patients. In clinical stage,there were 25 cases for 111,20 eases for IVa and 23 cases for IVb. The response was evaluated after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. There were CR 1 case, PR 27 cases, SD 30 cases and PD 10 cases. The RR was 41%. Conclusions The response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer could be assessed with RE- CIST criteria. The T stage of esophageal cancer according to barium meal X-ray film is more convenient for the clinical application.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2009年第5期521-523,共3页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 安徽省自然科学基金重点项目(No05021002)
关键词 食管癌 临床分期 RECIST 新辅助化疗 esophageal cancer RECIST clinical stage neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1S.B.Cheng,E.C.Chew.Human papillomavirus 16 E6 is associated with the nuclear matrix of esophageal carcinoma cells[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2001,7(6):788-791. 被引量:7
  • 2戎铁华,林鹏,吴一龙.胸段食管癌淋巴结转移的临床研究(附220例分析)[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,1994,10(3):242-244. 被引量:57
  • 3吴灵飞,姚俊国,吴祝东,吴名耀.食管癌内镜分型的临床意义[J].内镜,1995,12(3):146-148. 被引量:6
  • 4[1] Zhang DW,Cheng GY,Huang GT,et al.Operable squamous esophageal cancer:current results from the east[J].World J Surg,1994,18(3):347-357.
  • 5[2] Law SYK,Ed FRCS,Fok M,et al.Risk analysis in resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus[J].World J Surg,1994,18(3):339-346.
  • 6[3] Dachman AH,Levine MS.Radiology of the eso0hagus[J].Radiol, Clin North Am,1991,20(4):635-657.
  • 7[4] Ran Kin S,Mason R.Staging of oesophageal carcinoma[J].Clin Radiol,1992,46:373-377.
  • 8[5] Picus D,Balfe DM,Koehler RE,et al.Computed Tomography in the staging of esophageal carcinoma[J].Radiology,1983,146:433-438.
  • 9[6] K Sndenaa,Skaane P,Nygaard K,et al.Value computed tomography in preoperative evluation of resectability and staging in oesophageal careinoma[J].Eur J Surg,1992,158:537-540.
  • 10[7] Greenberg J.DurRin M,Druumen MV,et al.Computed tomography or EUS in preoperative staging of gastric and esophageal tumors[J].Surgery,1994,116:696-702.

共引文献171

同被引文献53

  • 1钱正子,王华庆,张熙曾.食管癌新辅助化疗研究进展[J].国外医学(肿瘤学分册),2005,32(10):772-775. 被引量:5
  • 2林丽珠,陶志广,周岱翰.WHO标准和RECIST在肺癌多中心疗效评价的比较[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(5):253-255. 被引量:41
  • 3Eisenhauer EA,Therasse P,Bogaerts J,et al.New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours:revised RECIST guideline(version 1.1)[J].Eur J Cancer,2009,45(2):228-247.
  • 4Burmeister BH,Smithers BM,Gebski V,et al.Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus:a randomised controlled phase Ⅲ trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2005,6(9):659-668.
  • 5Grivennikov SI,Greten FR,Karin M.Immunity,inflammation,and cancer[J].Cell,2010,140(6):883-899.
  • 6Batlivala SP.Focus on diagnosis:the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the C-reactive protein test[J].Pediatr Rev,2009,30(2):72-74.
  • 7World Health Organization (WHO). WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization, 1979.
  • 8Duffaud F, Therasse P. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. Bull Cancer, 2000, 87(12): 881-886.
  • 9Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2): 228-247.
  • 10James K, Eisenhauer E, Christian M, et al. Measuring response in solid tumors: unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999, 91(6): 523-528.

引证文献5

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部