期刊文献+

不同粘结剂对纵折牙根粘结后再植的疗效观察 被引量:3

The effect of 2 bonding material on the vertically fractured roots of Bonding Therapy & Intentional Replantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过2种粘结剂处理纵折牙根进行粘结后再植术,了解不同黏结剂对后牙纵折愈合类型的影响。方法:3只Beagle犬的前磨牙48个牙根,分成3组,分别用Clearfil SE Bond(CE组,n=18)和SuperBond C&B(SE组,n=18)进行粘结后再植,与正常牙根再植组(CC组,n=12)进行对照。术后16周处死动物,采集牙根-牙槽骨标本,按照"8等分法"和Andreasen愈合标准,记录各位点组织愈合情况,按有利愈合和不利愈合分类量化各组组织学愈合类型,并对各组牙根余留半径长按照0~4级评分,比较有效愈合率和余留牙根半径。结果:CE、SE、CC三组有效愈合率分别为:51%、31%、59%。余留半径评分分别为:3.38、2.47、3.59。CE组比SE组更能有效促进纵折牙根的愈合。结论:Clearfil SE BondAP-X粘结系统能有效降低炎症性吸收和置换性吸收的发生率,提高后牙纵折粘结后再植术的手术成功率。 Objective: The purpose of this study was to study the healing effect of histological favorable of 2 bonding material for the vertically fractured roots.To investigate the methods of improving the healing effect of Bonding Therapy & Intentional Replantation. Method: 48 premolar roots obtained from 3 Beagle dogs were selected, and were divided into 3 groups using different treatment (Clearfil SE Bond AP-X (CE Group, n=18), SuperBond C&B (SE Group, n=18)and Negative Control Group (CC Group, n=12)as randomly and controlled. Bonding Therapy & Intentional Replantation were done and the roots were replanted to original alveolar sockets.The specimens were used to make root ground section at 16 weeks after replantation.The root ground sections were evaluated for healing underwent optical sectioning microscopy to observe the condition of sorption and analyze in results the favorable healing and unfavorable healing according to histological evaluation. A starshaped shape with eight radii was marked on a coverslip and appeared into the eyepiece of a light microscope. The histomorphometric analysis was based upon the topographical method suggested by Andreasen. In addition, residual root mass was also measured to determined the extent of root structure loss for each treatment method and scored by 0-4. The favorable healing score and residual root mass were evaluated. Result.. The outcome of 16 weeks shows that, the difference was obviously and statistically significant. The favorable healing score of 3 group were respectively 51%,31%,59%. residual root mass score of 3 group were respectively: 3.38,2.47,3.59 .Roots treated with Clearfil SE Bond AP-X also resulted in significantly less loss due to resorption compared to those roots treated with SuperBond C&B. Conclusion: The results suggested that the treatment of vertical root fracture using Clearfil SE Bond AP-X has good prognostic possibilities.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2009年第5期302-304,共3页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词 BEAGLE犬 牙根纵折 粘结再植术 牙根吸收 有效愈合 余留牙根半径 beagle: vertically fractured root: bonding therapy & intentional replantation root resorption: favorable healing residual root mass
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Loe.H,Waerhaug I. Experimental replantation of teeth in dogs and monkeys[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 1961,3: 176.
  • 2常青,俞立英,吴斌,丁国强.三种牙本质粘接剂强度的体外测量与比较[J].上海口腔医学,2003,12(2):154-156. 被引量:6
  • 3YU Li-ying,XU Bei-yun,WU Bin,et al. Clincal research on treatment of vertically fractured posterior teeth by intentional replantation using dentin bonding and composite resin [J]. Osaka Dent Univ, 2004, 38 (2) : 101.
  • 4Andreasen JO, Borum MK, Jacobsen HL, et al. lteplantation of 400 avulsed permanent incisors. 4. Factors related to periodontal ligament healing[J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1995,11 : 76.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Paulo EC,Roberto R,Marcela RO.Evaluation of micro-tensile,shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengh of three adhesive systems[J].Dent Mater,1998,14:394-398.
  • 2Della Bona A,Van Noort R.Shear vs tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic[J].J Dent Res,1995,74:1591-1596.
  • 3Rueggeberg FA.Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure-Review of the literature[J].Dent Mater,1991,7:2-10.
  • 4Yoshiyama M,Sano H,Ebisu S,et al.Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin [J].J Dent Res,1996,75(6):1404-1413.
  • 5David H,Pashley DH,Sano H. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents:A review[J]. Dent Mater,1995,10:117-125.
  • 6Dunn WJ,Soderholm KJ.Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems[J].Am J Dent ,2001,14(5):297-303.
  • 7Fujishima A,Fujishima Y,Ferracane JL.Shear bond strength of four commercial bonding systems to CPTi[J].Dent Mater,1995,11(2):82-86.
  • 8Sugaya T,Kawanami M,Noguehi H.Periodontal healing after bonding treatment of vertical root fracture[J].Dent Traumatol ,2001,17:174-179.

共引文献5

同被引文献51

  • 1张卫群,朱智敏.全瓷修复的粘结剂及粘结技术[J].国外医学(口腔医学分册),2004,31(4):314-316. 被引量:19
  • 2刘燕舞,刘月华,张敬,姚畅旺.新型光固化正畸釉质粘结剂的生物相容性研究[J].口腔正畸学,2006,13(1):14-17. 被引量:4
  • 3Plotino G, Grande NM, Pecci R, et al. Three-dimensional imaging using microcomputed tornography for studying tooth macromorphology [ J ]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2006,137 ( 11 ) : 1555 - 1561.
  • 4Kimura Y, Tanabe M, Amano Y, et al. Basic study of the use of laser on detection of vertical root fracture [J].J Dent, 2009, 37 (12):909 - 912.
  • 5钟宏,李海普,祝爱兰.水溶性MIM粘结剂组分相容性的预测方法[J].粉末冶金工业,2007,17(5):14-18. 被引量:5
  • 6梁景章,汤应联,潘文仪,等.不同口腔修复材料生物相容性及3种材料充填恒磨牙邻面龋的临床验证[J].医药前沿,2013,(17):191-192.
  • 7王利力.超级粘结剂在脱位牙再植术中的应用[C].//第八届全国创伤学术会议论文集,2011:1404-1404.
  • 8Xi-xun Y, Fei L,Yuan-ting X,et al.In vitro study in the endothelial cell compatibility and endothelialization of genipin-crosslinked biological tissues for tissue-engineered vascular scaffolds.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010; 21(2): 777-785.
  • 9Ode PJ,Crompton DS.Compatibility of aphid resistance in soybean and biological control by the parasitoid Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).Biol Control. 2013; 64(3):255-262.
  • 10Cheuk KKL,Li BS,Lam JWY, et al.Synthesis, chain helicity, assembling structure, and biological compatibility of poly(phenylacetylene)s containing L-alanine moieties. Macromolecules.2008;41 (16):5997-6005.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部