摘要
可持续发展研究对地理学提出了挑战,也是地理学的发展机会,地理学家有责任在发展自己学科的同时把可持续发展的研究引向深入。地理学家要能对似乎已得到广泛认同的概念提出挑战性的思想,要在观念形态、经济-社会体制、科学技术三个层次上把可持续发展的论题引向深入,同时要对论题的空间尺度和时间尺度有明确的界定,尤其要重视区域尺度和近期的可持续发展研究,重视可持续发展思想和战略的可操作性。
The research on sustainable development is both a challenge to and an opportunity for geography. While developing the discipline of themselves, geographers should take the responsibility to deepen the research on sustainable development. The concept of sustainable development seems to be commonly accepted. Geographers may either recognize or criticize the concept. However, they must bring forward certain challengable ideas. The theses of sustainable development should be concretized at three levels. At the notion or ethics level, the traditional geographical idea, human earth harmony development, should be advocated. At the level of socio economic institution or system, we should contribute to the reformation of existing production manner, consumption pattern, social institution, political system, international interrelationship, administration system and technological system. At the scientific and technological level, the role of geographer seems clear, yet we should pay more attention to the selection of appropriate technology suitable for various localities. The spatial and temporal scales of the topics should be definitely identified. There are different issues at such various scales as global, national, regional, local and site. The sustainable development research at regional and local scales should be paid more attention to in particular for geographers. Regarding temporal scale, sustainable development should be planned in long, middle and short terms respectively. Economical growth and the reversal of impoverishment degradation spiral in short term are the most urgent tasks for some poverty areas. Only if the short term objects are realized, the sustainability concept can be operationalized.
出处
《地理研究》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
1998年第1期17-22,共6页
Geographical Research
基金
国家自然科学基金
关键词
可持续发展
研究论题
研究尺度
可操作比
地理学
sustainable development, identification of research thesis, identification of research scale, operationalization