期刊文献+

事件框架的语义连贯和连通--切刻小句的实例分析 被引量:17

Semantic Coherence and Connection within Event Frame Analysis of Cutting Clauses
原文传递
导出
摘要 事件框架是一种经验知识格式塔,它内部含各种概念结构。本文举切刻小句为例,论证事件框架的内部概念结构是连贯的,动作语义和变式语义是连通的。相关事件可以通过跨域隐喻延伸为不同的构式识解。通过连贯准则和连通准则,事件框架可以合理表述动词和变式之间的许多准入关系,并为词汇语言学和构式语法的争辩所遗留的问题提供解决路径。 Event frame is a gestalt of experience and an assembly of conceptual structures. With the clauses containing cutting verbs as evidence, the paper argues that the conceptual structures of event frame are coherent and that the action and alternations are semantically connected. Relevant events can be metaphorically extended to various structures of construal. Based on the coherence principle and connection principle, event frame can serve as an adequate model to account for the license of verbs into their relevant alternations. Event frame is also capable of providing some solution to the unsolved problems arising from the debate between lexical semantics and construction grammar.
作者 程琪龙
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期10-19,共10页 Journal of Foreign Languages
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划基金项目2006BYY004(小句基本构式的认知操作系统)资助.
关键词 事件框架 识解构式 词汇语义学 切刻小句 event frame construal lexical semantics clauses of cutting
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Saussure, Ferdinand De. Cours de Linguistique Generale. Translated by Wade Baskin (1959) as Course in General Linguistics [ M ]. New York: Philosophical Library, 1916.
  • 2Hjelmslev, L. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language [ M ]. Translated by Francis J. Whitefield. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1961.
  • 3Lamb, Sydney M. Outline of Stratificational Grammar [ M ]. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 1966.
  • 4Lamb, Sydney M. Pathways of the Brain: The Neurocognitive Basis of Language [ M ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 1999.
  • 5Pinker, S. Learnability and Cognition : The Acquisition of Argument Structure [ M ]. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: MIT Press, 1989.
  • 6Levin, B. English Verb Classes and Alternations [ M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
  • 7Lakoff, George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind [ M ]. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987.
  • 8Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live by [ M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 9Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh [ M]. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
  • 10Langacker, Ronald W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol 1 : Theoretical Prerequisites [ M ]. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, 1987.

二级参考文献10

  • 1程琪龙.谓元·语义结构·概念框架[J].外国语,2005,28(5):10-16. 被引量:13
  • 2程琪龙.神经认知语言学引论[M].外文出版社,2005.
  • 3Jackendoff,R.Semantic Structures[M].Cambridge,Mass.:The MIT Press,1990.
  • 4Talmy,Leonard.Toward a Cognitive Semantics (Vol.1):Conceptual Structuring System[M].Cambridge,Mass.:The MIT Press,2000.
  • 5Sternberg,Robert.Cognitive Psychology (2nd ed.)[M].New York:Harcourt Brace College Publishers,1999.
  • 6Langacker,Ronald.W.Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise[A].Janssen,Theo and Gisela Redeker.Cognitive Linguistics:Foundations,Scope,and Methodology[C] Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter,1999,13 -60.
  • 7Lamb,Sydney.Pathways of the Brain:The Neurocognitive Basis of Language[M].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,1999.
  • 8Lakoff,George.Women,Fire,and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1987.
  • 9Tai,James,H-Y.Cognitive relativism:Resultative constructions in Chinese[J].Language and Linguistics,2003,4(2):301 -306.
  • 10Peeters."Does Cognitive Linguistics live up to its name?".www.tulane.eud/~howard/LangIdeo/Peeters/Peeters.html.

共引文献16

同被引文献199

引证文献17

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部