期刊文献+

汉语话题结构制约的认知语义与语用分析 被引量:8

A Cognitive Semantic and Pragmatic Account of the Constraints on Chinese Topic Constructions
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从认知语义与语用角度对汉语话题结构的制约作出统一的解释。本文基于认知语法中关于参照点关系的理论,为汉语话题结构制定出一条总体的许可条件,即:话题必须与述题小句中的某个论元存在领属关系,从而确立话题与述题小句的参照点关系。这个总体条件可分化为三条具体条件:(1)话题与述题小句中的某个论元之间是"原型领属关系;"(2)话题与述题小句中的某个论元是"自我领属关系;"(3)话题与述题某个论元是"方位领属关系"。语用因素在话题结构中的作用是:(1)与话题建立领属关系的论元可以通过语用推理获得;(2)语用解读会阻断话题与述题之间的参照点关系,导致话题结构不合法。 This article outlines a unified account of the constraints on Chinese topic constructions from a cognitive semantic and pragmatic perspective. Based on the reference point theory in cognitive grammar, we propose a general licensing condition for Chinese topic constructions: there should be a possessive relationship between the topic and a certain argument in the comment clause. This condition has three sub-conditions: ( 1 ) there is a " prototypical possessive relationship" between the topic and a certain argument in the comment clause; (2) there is a "self- possessive relationship" between the topic and a certain argument in the comment clause; (3) there is a "locative possessive relationship" between the topic and a certain argument in the comment clause. Pragmatics has twofold functions in the formation of Chinese topic constructions: (1) the argument that establishes possessive relationship with the topic can be gained from pragmatic inference; (2) pragmatic inference may block the reference point relationship between the topic and the comment, leading to the ill-formedness of the construction.
作者 胡旭辉
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期60-68,共9页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 汉语话题结构 许可条件 认知语义分析 语用分析 Chinese topic constructions licensing condition cognitive semantic analysis pragmatic analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1陆俭明.周遍性主语及其他[J].中国语文,1986,(3).
  • 2徐烈炯,刘丹青.话题的结构与功能[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2007.
  • 3Chafe, Wallence L. Givenness, Contrastivenss, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View[ A]. Li, Charles N. Subject and Topic[ C]. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
  • 4Chao, Yuanren. A Grammar of Modern Spoken Chinese [ M ]. Berkeley and Eos Angeles: University of California Press, 1968.
  • 5Fillmore, C. The case for case [ A ]. Bach, E. and Harms, R. Universals in Linguistic Theory [ C ]. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
  • 6Heine, B. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces and Grammaticalization [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 7Huang, C.-T. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar [ D ]. PhD. Dissertation. Cambridge Mass: MIT, 1982. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998.
  • 8Huang, C.-T. Remarks on empty categories in Chinese[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1987, (18).
  • 9Huang, C. -T. and Li, Y. -H., Recent generative studies on Chinese syntax[ A ]. Huang, C. -T. and Li, Y.-H. New Horizons of Chinese Linguistics [ C ]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
  • 10Huang, Yah. Tae Syntax and Pragrics of Anaphora: A Study with Spedal Reference to Chinese [M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

共引文献22

同被引文献146

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部