期刊文献+

桃树茎直径微变化与土壤水势及气象因子的关系 被引量:18

Micro-variation in peach stem diameter and its relationship with soil water potential and meteorological factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对充分供水和逐步干旱处理的盆栽"仕女红"桃树茎直径微变化动态的观测,分析了茎直径日最大收缩量(MDS)、日增长量(DI)和日最大值恢复时间(RT)对水分状况和气象因子的响应,并对适宜灌溉控制指标进行了探讨。结果表明:随土壤水势降低,桃树茎直径MDS和RT呈增大趋势,DI呈下降趋势并由正值变为负值;气象因子对桃树茎直径变化影响显著,太阳辐射(Rn)和空气相对湿度(RH)对MDS影响最强烈,连续降雨对DI和RT影响显著。DI受土壤水势影响产生变化的趋势明显并受气象因子影响较小,是最理想的灌溉控制指标,可将DI=0作为灌溉控制临界值;MDS受气象因子影响强烈,变异性较大,且需要充分灌溉条件下的MDS作为参考,RT与土壤水势的相关性不高,因此均不适合单独作为灌溉控制指标。 In well-irrigated and gradual-drought pot experiments, micro-variations in "Shinvhong" peach stem diameter were continuously monitored. Responses in maximum dally stem shrinkage (MDS), stem increase (DO, and stem diameter recovering time (RT) to soil water potential and meteorological factors were then analyzed and a suitable irrigation index established. The results show that when soil water potential decreases, RT and MDS increase while DI rapidly drops below zero. Meteorological factors have a notable impact on peach stem diameter. Factors including radiation and air relative humidity have the strongest impact on stem diameter. In fact continuous rainfall significantly affects DI and RT. DI is the most ideal irrigation indicator as it is very much influenced by soil water potential and less affected by meteorological factors. DI value of zero is probably the best irrigation threshold. MDS is strongly affected by meteorological factors and requires reference MDS under well-irrigated conditions. RT on the other hand is not significantly related with soil water potential. Therefore neither of these variables is suitable as irrigation index.
出处 《中国生态农业学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期489-494,共6页 Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture
基金 国家高技术发展计划“863计划”农业重大专项(2002AA2Z4211)资助
关键词 桃树 干旱胁迫 茎直径 日最大收缩量 日增长量 土壤水势 气象因子 灌溉指标 Peach, Gradual-drought stress, Stem diameter, Maximum daily shrinkage, Daily increase, Soil water potential, Meteorological factor, Irrigation index
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1张寄阳,段爱旺,孟兆江,刘祖贵.基于茎直径变化的作物水分状况监测研究进展[J].中国农业气象,2004,25(4):11-13. 被引量:13
  • 2Goldhamer D. A., Fereres E., Salinas M., et al. Can almond trees directly dictate their irrigation needs?[J]. Calif. Agric., 2003, 57(4): 138-144.
  • 3Remorini D., Massai R. Comparison of water status indicators for young peach trees[J]. Irrig. Sci., 2003, 22(1): 39-46.
  • 4Jones H. G. Irrigation scheduling: Advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods[J]. J. Exp. Bot., 2004, 55(407): 2427-2436.
  • 5Klepper B., Browning V. D., Taylor H. M. Stem diameter in relation to plant water status[J]. Plant Physiology, 1971, 48(6): 683-685.
  • 6Mcburney T., Costigan E A. The relationship between stem diameter and water potentials in stems of young cabbage plants[J]. J. Exp. Bot., 1984, 35(12): 1787-1793.
  • 7Gamier E., Berger A. Effect of water stress on stem diameter changes of peach trees growing in field[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1986, 23:193-209.
  • 8Higgs K. H., Jones H.G. A microcomputer-based system for continuous measurement and recording fruit diameter in relation to environmental factors[J]. J. Exp. Bot., 1984, 35(11): 1646-1655.
  • 9Li S. H., Huguet J. G., Bussi C. Irrigation scheduling in a mature peach orchard using tensiometers and dendrometers[J]. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 1989, 3(1): 1-12.
  • 10Goldhamer D. A., Fereres E. Irrigation scheduling of almond trees with trunk diameter sensors[J]. Irrigation Science, 2004, 23(1): 11-19.

二级参考文献90

共引文献212

同被引文献220

引证文献18

二级引证文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部