论第三人证据披露义务

The Third Party's Duty of Publication of Evidence

确定第三人披露证据的义务可以大大节约诉讼资源,有利于诉讼真实的发现,有利于我国的审判模式从职权主义向当事人主义的转变。英美法系国家通过证据开示程序要求第三人披露证据;大陆法系国家是通过规定第三人的协助义务予以确认。我国关于第三人证据披露义务的法律规定条款极少且不完善。完善我国第三人证据披露义务的基本思路:坚持第三人证据披露义务立法原则,把第三人证据披露义务的范围限于文书证据的范畴,请求第三人披露证据的阶段应当限制在举证时效之内,如果第三人违背披露证据的义务就必须承担一定的责任。

Ascertaining the third party＇ duty of publication of evidence can greatly save legal resouree, and is beneficial to revealing legal truth and transforming from pattern of authority principle to pattern of litigant principle. Although the exchange system of civil procedure evidence includes the basic factors of the publication rules of Chinese civil procedure evidcnce, the exchanging rules have not yet been established as independent ones for evidence in civil procedure legislatinn. The centralized publication of evidence needs further improvement in procedure. This paper expounds the main contents of the publication rules of civil evidence and the publication modes in both British and American laws. The basis for establishing our country＇s third party bearing evidence revealing duty range and way ought to fit in with each other with national conditions, and suggest that we sbould set up this duty by a asymptote way.