摘要
目的探讨溴脱氧尿嘧啶核苷(BUdR)标记BUdR/DNA双参数流式细胞仪(FCM)测定肿瘤潜在倍增时间Tpot的方法,比较BUdR在体(invivo)、离体(invitro)标记结果的差异。材料与方法实验采用人鼻咽癌裸小鼠移植瘤模型分别进行BUdR在体、离体标记;离体标记时分别将样本制成组织块和细胞悬液在0.5mM、0.1mMBUdR的含20%胎牛血清RPMI1640培养基、5%CO2、37℃、CO2孵箱中开放培养不同时间后收集样本。在体标记:腹腔注射BUdR0.1mg/g体重,6小时后处死小鼠取瘤剪碎,在70%的冷乙醇固定冰箱保存;全部样本用FITCPI染色后行FCM测定。结果(1)本实验室的BUdR离体培养条件下,组织块标记较理想。(2)用BUdR在体标记法测定不同大小的肿瘤(直径0.3~1.2cm),结果表明:直径<0.5cm的肿瘤的标记效果比较理想。(3)相同体积的肿瘤在体(n=9)、离体(n=7)标记两种不同标记方法的结果显示,相同体积的肿瘤用BUdR离体标记法时LI比在体标记低53%,其它各项细胞动力学参数两者均有明显差异,但离体标记法的组内变异很小。结论本实验室成功建立了在体BUdR标记BU?
Purpose To investigate the method for BUdR incorporation and BUdR/DNA bivariated FCM in determing Tpot,and to compare BUdR incorporation in vitro and in vivo method for Tpot measurement. Materials and Methods Carcinoma of nasopharyngeal xenografts in nude mice were used for Tpot measurement in vivo and in vitro BUdR incorporation method.In vitro experiment ,the tissue fragments (in 1mm3 blocks with 0.1mM BUdR) and the cell suspension(0.05,0.1mM BUdR) were incubated in RPMI 1640 medium containing 20% fetal calf serum at 37℃ and 5% CO2 in CO2 incubator for different durations;in vivo experiment ,the nude mice were injected i.p. with 0.1mg/g BUdR and sacrificed six hours later.The samples were fixed in 70% ethanol and stored in dark at -20℃.All samples were prepared as routine for FITCPI staining and measured by Coulter EPICS751 FCM.Results (1)In vitro experiment,better results were obtained from the tissue fragments labelling than cell suspension with BUdR.(2)The results were better when the tumour diameter was about 0.5cm with in vivo BUdR incorporation for six hours.(3) Through comparing in vitro(n=7) BUdR incorporation method for Tpot measurement,the labelling index (LI) in vitro incorpation method was 53% lower than in vivo method and the differences also existed in other cell kinetic parameters while interdeviation of in vitro method showed quite small deviation.Conclusion The method for measuring of Tpot is successfully set up.Appropriate culture condition in vitro labeling method is obtained.There is obvious difference between the results of in vivo labeling and in vitro labeling.
出处
《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
1998年第1期17-21,共5页
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology