期刊文献+

井冈霉素对3种生防芽孢杆菌的生长抑制活性 被引量:2

Effects of Jinggangmycin on 3 Species of Bacillus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 管碟法测定了井冈霉素对12株枯草芽孢杆菌(Bacillus subtilis)、6株苏云金芽孢杆菌(B.thuringiensis)及3株蜡质芽孢杆菌(Bacillus cereus)的离体抑制活性。结果表明,不同种以及同种不同菌株的芽孢杆菌对井冈霉素的敏感性存在差异,但从总体上看,井冈霉素A对大多数枯草芽孢杆菌的抑制作用较强,而对大多数蜡质芽孢杆菌和苏云金芽孢杆菌的抑制活性较低,在1.00×105mg/L浓度下仅有轻微的抑制作用。 Antimierobial effects of Jinggangmycin on 12 isolates of Bacillus subtilis, 6 isolates of B. thuringiensis, and 3 isolates of B. cereus were determined by cylinder-plate method in vitro. The results indicated that there were differences in the sensitivity of different species of Bacillus and different isolates of the same species to Jinggangmycin. As a whole, most isolates of B.subtilis were and B.cereus were relatively sensitive to Jinggangmycin, while most isolates of B. thuringiensis insensitive to it, only with very low inhibitory activity at 1.00×10^5mg/L.
出处 《农药科学与管理》 CAS 2009年第5期39-41,44,共4页 Pesticide Science and Administration
关键词 井冈霉素 有效霉素 芽孢杆菌 抑菌活性 Jinggangmycin validamycin Bacillus inhibitory activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献28

  • 1文才艺,吴元华,田秀玲.微生物源生物化学农药的研究与开发进展[J].农药,2004,43(10):438-441. 被引量:27
  • 2沈寅初.井冈霉素研究开发25年[J].植物保护,1996,22(4):44-45. 被引量:62
  • 3商洪生,植物免疫学实验,1994年,27页
  • 4陈志宜,中国农业科学,1992年,25卷,4期,41页
  • 5李树正(译),农药实验法——杀菌剂篇,1991年,235页
  • 6沈寅初,抗生素,1981年,6卷,1期,58页
  • 7上海市农药所农用抗菌素组,井冈霉素,1977年
  • 8Thomson W T.Agricultural Chemicals Book IV Fungicides[M].Fresno CA:Thomson Publications,1982.
  • 9Kameda Y,Horii S,Yamano T.Microbial transformation of validamycins[J].J Antihiot,1975,28:298.
  • 10Asano N,Takeuchi M,Ninomiya K,et al.Microbial degradation of validamycin A by Flavobacterium saccharophilum.Enzymatic cleavage of C-N linkage in validoxylamine A[J].J Antibiot,1984,37:859.

共引文献123

同被引文献80

  • 1沈寅初.井冈霉素研究开发25年[J].植物保护,1996,22(4):44-45. 被引量:62
  • 2罗小华,肖明徽,胡德广,周定坤.生物农药——康地蕾得防治青枯病初报[J].江西植保,2006,29(1):38-40. 被引量:7
  • 3中华人民共和国农业部农药检定所.中国农药信息网有效成分查询[DB/OL].[2014-2-27].http ://www. chinapesticide.gov. cn/.
  • 4United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of pesticide programs [ DB/OL ]. [ 2014-2-27 ]. http: //www. epa. gov/pesticides/biopesticides/ingredients/.
  • 5MELIN P, HAKANSSON S, SCHNORER J. Optimisation and comparison of liquid and dry formulations of the biocontrol yeast Pichia anomala J121 [ J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2007, 73 (5) : 1008 -1016.
  • 6TRIVEDI P, PANDEY A. Plant growth promotion abilities and formulation of Bacillus megaterium strain B 388 ( MTCC6521 ) isolated from a temperate Himalayan location [ J ]. Indian J Microbiol, 2008, 48 ( 3 ) : 342 - 347.
  • 7SRINIVASAN K, MATHIVANAN N. Biological control of sunflower necrosis virus disease with powder and liquid formulations of plant growth promoting microbial consortia under field conditions [ J ]. Biol Control, 2009, 51 ( 3 ) : 395 - 402.
  • 8SALLAM N, ABD ELRAZIK A A, HASSAN M, et al. Powder formulations of Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma spp and Coniothyrium minitans for biocontrol of onion white rot [ J ]. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot, 2009, 42(2) : 142 - 147.
  • 9NAYAKA S C, SHANKAR A C U, REDDY M S, et al. Control of Fusarium verticillioides, cause of ear rot of maize, by Pseudomonas fluorescens [ J ]. Pest Manag Sci, 2009, 65 ( 7 ) : 769 - 775.
  • 10ARDAKANI S S, HEYDARI A, KHORASANI N, et al. Development of new bioformulations of Pseudomonas fluorescens and evaluation of these products against damping-off of conton seedlings[ J]. J Plant Pathol, 2010, 92( 1 ) : 83 - 88.

引证文献2

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部