期刊文献+

悖论的语言结构:递归否定 被引量:3

The Language Structure of Paradox:Recursive Negation
原文传递
导出
摘要 悖论是逻辑学、基础数学、哲学、语言学中的重要问题,从根本上看是一个认识论问题,因此仅仅从人工语言的角度来认识悖论是不充分的,因为人工语言不能解决元语言这一根本问题。自然语言是最根本的元语言,悖论更需要从自然语言的角度来认识,尤其是从自然语言结构的递归性来认识。通常把悖论分成逻辑悖论(集合悖论)和语义悖论两大类,但这种分类界限并不严格。实际上这两类悖论从语言生成的角度看都具有递归否定的特点,因此可以用递归否定这一语言结构性质来统一语法悖论和语义悖论。罗素的类型论和塔尔斯基语义理论主要涉及产生悖论的层阶性质,不能概括悖论的递归否定性质。自然语言和形式语言都是从有限规则和有限符号到无限句子的系统,不可能避免层阶循环或递归,因此悖论的消除不可能通过类型论或元语言层阶来解决,考虑递归否定的性质是消除悖论的一个途径。 Basically, language, Paradox is an important problem in logic, foundation of mathematics, philosophy and linguistics. paradox is a problem of epistemology. It is not enough to research on paradox on the line of formal because the problem of metalanguage can not be resolved on the base of formal language. Natural languages are most primitive metalanguages, and paradox needs to be studied more on the line of natural especially on the line of recursion of the structure of natural languages language. Paradox is usually divided into logic paradox and semantic paradox. However, the border is not clear. Both of them have the feature of recursive negation and can be explained generally by the feature. Both Russell's type theory and Tarski' s semantic hierarchy concern the hierarchy of paradox but fail to cover the recursive negation. Either the natural language or the language can produce infinite sentences by finite rules and symbols, thus the hierarchy and recursion of theory formal language can not be avoided, so the paradox can not be cleared only by the type theory and semantic hierarchy theory. It is one of the ways to clear paradox on the line recursive negation.
作者 陈保亚 陈樾
出处 《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期108-116,共9页 Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(60773159) 教育部基地重大项目(2006JDXM007) 国家社科基金重点项目(04AYY001)
关键词 悖论 语言结构 递归否定 认识论 Paradox language structure reeursive negation epistemology
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Barwise, K. J. & J. Etchemendy ( 1987 ) The Liar : An Essay in Truth and Circtdarity, Stanford University Press.
  • 2Barwise, K. J. & J. Perry(1983) Situations and Attitudes , Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • 3Burge, T. (1979)Semantic Paradox, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 76.
  • 4Chen, Baoya (2001)An Analysis of the Conceptions of Language in the Twentieth-Century' s Philosophy of Language, Contemporary Chinese Thought, Spring 2001/Vol. 32, No. 3, USA.
  • 5陈保亚.论自然语言在语言哲学中的元语言地位[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,35(3):41-45. 被引量:3
  • 6Gupta, A. & N. Belnap (1998) The Revision Theory of Truth, Cambridge : The MIT Press.
  • 7Herzberger, H. G., 1982, Naive Semantics and Liar Paradox, The Journal of Phylosopy, Vol. 79.
  • 8克莱因.(1981).《古今数学思想》(第4册).北京大学数学系数学史翻译组译.上海科学技术出版社.
  • 9Koons, R. (1992) Paradoxes of Belief and Strategic Rationality, Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Kripke, S. (1973)Outline of the theory of truth, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 72.

二级参考文献2

共引文献2

同被引文献24

  • 1蔡光.语言本质及其基本层次探究[J].辽宁教育行政学院学报,2006,23(9):91-93. 被引量:1
  • 2[英]威廉·涅尔,玛莎·涅尔.逻辑学的发展[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985.1.
  • 3[英]罗素.哲学问题[M].何兆武译,北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 4[英]罗素.逻辑与知识[M].苑利均译.北京:商务印书馆,1996.
  • 5Bloomfield, 1935, linguistic aspects of science, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2, No. 4 (Oct., 1935), pp. 499 - 517.
  • 6Chomsky, N., 1956, (Three models for the description of language ), I. R. E. Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. IT - 2, Proceedings of the Symosium on Information Theory, Sept, 1956.
  • 7Chomsky, N. ,1957,(<Syntactic Structures} ,Mouton, the Hague.
  • 8Godel, K. , 1931, tiber formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia mathematica und verwandter Systeme I, Monatshefte far Mathematik und Physik, Vol. 38 ( 1931 ) , pp. 173 - 198. Also in Kurt Godel Collected Works Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Inc. 1986.
  • 9Gtidel, K. , 1934, On undecidable propositions of formal mathematical Systems, in Kurt Godel Collected Works,Volum 1, Oxford University Press, Inc. 1986.
  • 10Kripke, S. , 1973, < Outline of the theory of truth>, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 72.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部