戴震与方志及其手稿与胡适跋文

DAI Zhen,Local History,DAI's Manuscripts and the Colophon by HU Shi

史传戴震纂修了《汾州府志》和《汾阳县志》,因为二志未署戴名,所以引发后人质疑,通过以二志内容及戴震纂修主张,与署名纂修人汾州知府孙和相所修的《中牟县志》内容相比较,参证北京大学收藏的戴震手稿中的修志稿件,证明二志确出戴震之手;并进一步通过戴震的论述和他与章学诚的讨论,归纳了戴震修志的五点主张。戴震手稿共23篇文章,包括有关《汾州府志》文章四篇,有关《汾阳县志》文章四篇,有关修志文章三篇,有关家乡歙县山水文章二篇,有关其他经典文章四篇、杂文六篇。胡适先生曾撰长篇跋文,予以考评。经过重新分析考证,对23篇文章是否戴震作品,及有关的问题和胡适先生的意见,做了新的评议及结论。确定23篇中绝大多数是戴震的作品,少数是戴震改定作品的原稿,只有段玉裁作黄烈妇庙碑一篇,完全与戴震无关。旧说戴震手稿是抄本有误,确实是戴震的稿本。

It is recorded in histories that DAI Zhen compiled the Local History of Fenzhou Prefecture and Local History of Fenyang County. But both of the books were printed without DAI Zhen's name. So the record was questioned by later generations. Having compared the contents of the two gazetteers and the opinions on compiling local histories with the contents of Local History of Zhongmou County compiled by SUN He-xiang,prefected of Fenzhou Prefecture,and checked the DAI Zhen's manuscripts on compiling local histories held in Peking University Library,reaching a conclusion that the two gazetteers are compiled by DAI Zhen. DAIi Zhen's five opinions on compiling local histories are drawn from his exposition and his discussion with Zhang Xue-cheng. DAI's manuscripts includes 23 papers in total,four on Local History of Fenzhou Prefecture,four on Local History of Fenyang County,three on compiling local histories,two on mountains and rivers at She county,his home town,four on classics and six are essays. There is a long colophon by Mr. HU Shi. Thorough textural research once more,reached a new conclusion on the questions that if the 23 papers were written by DAI Zhen and Mr. HU Shi's opinion on it. That is,the most of the 23 papers were written by DAI Zhen. Few of them were original manuscripts of final version. Only one of them,Temple Stele of Heroic Woman Huang,was written by DUAN Yu-cai,not relevant to DAI Zhen. It is not correct that the manuscripts are transcripts. They are original manuscripts.