期刊文献+

中国英语学习者在句子语境中消解英语词汇歧义的认知模式 被引量:18

The resolution of English lexical ambiguity by Chinese EFL learners in sentential context
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过两个实验探讨了中国英语学习者在句子语境中对歧义词与语境一致词义的激活和与语境不一致词义的抑制过程。结果发现,虽然高、低水平受试在句子语境中的歧义消解过程都遵循顺序通达模型,但两者有本质区别:1)高水平受试的歧义消解过程是自动的,而低水平受试是受控的;2)高水平受试对无关信息的抑制能力强于低水平受试。实验结果支持基于用法的理论和结构建造框架理论。 Two experiments have been conducted to explore Chinese EFL learners' activation of the contextually appro-priate meanings and suppression of the contextually inappropriate meanings of ambiguous words in sentential con-text.The results show that although the disambiguation of lexical ambiguity in sentential context by the high and low proficiency learners both followed the Ordered-Access Model,the high proficiency learners' disambiguation was different from that of the low proficiency learners in two aspects:1)The high proficiency learners' disambi-guating process was autonomous,while the low proficiency learners' was controlled;2)The high proficiency learners suppressed the contextually inappropriate meanings more efficiently than the low proficiency learners.The findings of the present study are consistent with the usage-based approach and the structure building theory.
作者 赵晨 董燕萍
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期170-178,共9页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(项目号07JJD740067) 广东外语外贸大学校级重点研究基地项目"英语词汇歧义消解的认知过程研究"的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Chwilla, D. & H. Kolk. 2003. Event-related potential and reaction time evidence for inhibition between alternative meanings of ambiguous words [J]. Brain and Language 86: 167-192.
  • 2Duffy, S., R. Morris & K. Rayner. 1988. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 27: 429-446.
  • 3Elston-Guttler, K. &A. Friederici. 2005. Native and L2 processing of homonyms in sentential context [J].Journal of Memory and Language 52: 256- 283.
  • 4Frenck-Mestre, C. & P. Prince. 1997. Second language autonomy [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 481-501.
  • 5Gernsbacher, M. 1990. Language Comprehension as Structure Building[M].Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 6Glucksberg, S., R. Kreuz&S. Rho. 1986. Context can constrain lexical access: Implications for models of language comprehension [J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12: 323-335.
  • 7Love, T., E. Maas&D. Swinney. 2003. The influence of language exposure on lexical and syntactic language processing [J].Experimental Psychology 50 : 204-216.
  • 8Lucas, M. 1987. Frequency effects on the processing of ambiguous words in sentence context [J]. Language and Speech 30: 25-46.
  • 9Simpson, G. & G. Kellas. 1989. Dynamic contextual processes and lexical access [A]. In D. Gorfein (ed.). Resolving Semantic Ambiguity [C]. New York: Springer. 40-56.
  • 10Swinney, D. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re) consideration of context effects [J]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Ver- bal Behavior 18: 645-659.

同被引文献233

引证文献18

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部