论体育协会的诉讼地位及相关制度的完善——从“凤铝”和“光谷”两案说起

On the Suit Status of Sport Association and the Improvement of Related Laws——Taking Fenglu and Guanggu for Exemple

"凤铝"篮球俱乐部和"光谷"足球俱乐部因对体育协会的决定不满而退出各自所在的体育协会。在退出以后,按照现行的法律制度,无法通过诉讼进行权利的司法救济。从法律上看,俱乐部与单项体育协会之间的关系有两种:一是平等的民事法律关系,二是隶属型的管理关系。这两种情形下产生的纠纷可以分别通过民事诉讼和行政诉讼来解决。《体育法》和三大诉讼法应进行修改,明确体育协会的诉讼地位,同时应建立全国性体育仲裁机构作为诉讼机制的补充。

＂Fenglu＂ basketball club and ＂Guanggu＂ football club have exited from their own sport association for they dissatisfied with the decisions of the sports association. But after their exit, they can＇t protect their rights through lawsuits according to current laws. There are two relations between clubs and sport association： equal civil relation and managerial subject relation. The .conflicts in these two relations can be settled by civil suit and administrative suit. The Sports Code and other procedure laws should be amended to give a clear suit position of sport association. Nationwide sports arbitrator is necessary as a complement to the lawsuit system.