期刊文献+

^(18)F-FDG PET显像在非小细胞肺癌患者预后判断中的价值 被引量:1

The Value of ^(18)F-FDG PET in Predicting the Prognosis of NSCLC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的PET已广泛应用于非小细胞肺癌的诊断及监测、治疗后评价、随访。但PET在非小细胞肺癌患者预后判断中的意义尚不是十分明确。本研究探讨18F-FDGPET显像在非小细胞肺癌患者预后判断中的价值。方法对66例非小细胞肺癌患者PET中原发病灶和转移病灶最高SUV(标准化摄取比)对患者生存的预测价值进行分析。结果原发病灶最高SUV为(6.3±3.2),全部转移病灶最高SUV为(4.3±3.1),肺门纵隔淋巴结转移灶最高SUV为(4.6±3.4)。原发灶最高SUV≥7组和<7组的总生存期分别为26.1个月和38.7个月(P=0.02)。淋巴结转移灶最高SUV≥5和<5患者的生存期分别为17.0个月和28.9个月(P<0.001)。单因素分析显示原发病灶SUV、淋巴结转移灶SUV、肿瘤分期、肿瘤的病理类型、分化程度、是否接受手术治疗、转移器官个数、PET发现淋巴结转移、PET发现骨转移是非小细胞肺癌的预后影响因素。多因素分析显示PET检查时是否发现转移病灶,是否接受手术治疗以及肿瘤病理高分化是非小细胞肺癌生存的独立预后因素。结论非小细胞肺癌患者确诊时PET检查中原发灶最高SUV、转移淋巴结最高SUV可以作为判断非小细胞肺癌患者生存的预后因素。 Background and objective ^18F-FDG PET has been widely applied in the diagnosis, treatment evaluation and following up of NSCLC. But the usefulness of PET in the prognosis predicting of NSCLC is uncertain. The purpose of the study is to investigate the value of ^18F-FDG PET in the prognosis of NSCLC. Methods The value of SUV of primary and metastasis lesions to the prognosis of NSCLC were analyzed. Results SUV of primary lesions, all the metastasis lesions and hilar and/or mediastinal metastatic lymphnodes were (6.3 ± 3.2), (4.3 ± 3.1) and (4.6 ±3.4) respectively. Overall survival (OS) of patients whose SUV of primary lesions≥ 7 and〈 7 ones were 26.1 and 38.7 months (P=0.02). OS of patients whose SUV of lymphnodes metastasis≥ 5 and〈 5 ones were 17.0 and 28.9 months (P〈0.001). Kaplen-Meier survival analysis revealed that SUV of primary lcsions≥ 7, SUV of lymphnodes metastasis≥ 5, cancer stage, pathological status of tumor, differentiation of tumor, receiving surgery or not, numbers of organs that had metastasis, lymphnodes metastasis positive or not in PET scan, bone metastasis positive or not in PET scan were prognostic factors of NSCLC. Multivariate analysis suggested that tumor metastasis positive or not at PET scan, receiving surgery or not and the differentiation status was well-differentiated or not are independent prognostic factors of NSCLC patients. Conclusion SUV of primary lesions and hilar and/or mediastinal lymphnodes in newly diagnosed NSCLC can be prognostic factors for NSCLC patients.
出处 《中国肺癌杂志》 CAS 2009年第5期417-421,共5页 Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
关键词 正电子发射断层显像 标准化摄取比 肺恶性肿瘤 预后 Positron-Emission Tomography Standard uptake value Lung neoplasms Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hignshi K,Ueda Y,Arisaka Y,et al.^18F-FDG uptake as a biologic prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with surgically resected nonsmall cell lung cancer.J Nucl Med,2002,43(1):39-45.
  • 2Duhaylongsod FG,Lowe VJ,Patz EF,et al.Lung tumor growth correlates with glucose metabolism measured by fluoride-^18 fluoredeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.Ann Thorac Surg,1995,60(5):1348-1352.
  • 3吴涛,潘铁成,郑智,陈涛,潘友民.Glut-1、Glut-3在NSCLC和肺良性病变中的表达及其与FDG摄取的关系[J].中国肺癌杂志,2008,11(4):555-558. 被引量:4
  • 4田丰,韩勇,赵正源,杨晔,陈连宏,程庆书.氟-18-脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射体层摄影术对胸部恶性肿瘤诊断价值的初步评价[J].中国肺癌杂志,2007,10(4):310-312. 被引量:3
  • 5Kieninger AN,Welsh R,Bendick PJ,et al.Positron-emission tomography as a prognostic tool for eurly-stnge lung cancer.Am J Surg,2006,191(3):433-436.
  • 6Sanghera B,Wong WL,Lodge MA,et al.Potential novel application of dual time point SUV measurements as a predictor of survival in head and neck cancer.Nucl Med Commun,2005,26(10):861-867.
  • 7Mochiki E,Kuwano H,Katoh H,et al.Evaluation of ^18F-2-deoxy2-fluoro-d-gluocose positron emission tomography for gastric cancer.World J Surg,2004,280):247-253.
  • 8陈香,赵军,管一晖,陆舜,左传涛,华逢春.^(18)F-FDG PET显像在肺癌预后评价中的应用[J].中华核医学杂志,2007,27(5):269-272. 被引量:11
  • 9Hanin FX,Lonneux M,Comet J,et al.Prognostic value of FDG uptake in early stage non-small cell lung caneer.Eur J Cardiothorse Surg,2008,34(4):932-933.
  • 10Al-Sarraf N,Gately K,Lucey J,et al.Clinical implication and prognostic significance of standurdised uptake value of primary non-small cell lung cancer on positron emission tomography:analysis of 176 cases.Eur J Cardiothome Surg,2008,34(4):892-897.

二级参考文献30

  • 1黄国俊,张德超,毛友生,李鉴,王永岗,王大力,薛奇,高树庚,张良泽,雷文东,高禹舜,赵峻,黄进丰,杨昆,苏凯,朱守营,韦森,冯飞跃.肺癌的临床分期与外科病理TNM分期比较[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(9):551-553. 被引量:22
  • 2JM Ramia,K Muffak,A Fernández,J Villar,D Garrote,JA Ferron.Gallbladder tuberculosis: False-positive PET diagnosis of gallbladder cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(40):6559-6560. 被引量:5
  • 3[1]Chang CH,Wang HE,Wu SY,et al.Comparative evaluation of FET and FDG for differentiating lung carcinoma from inflammation in mice.Anticancer Res,2006,26(2):917-925.
  • 4[3]De Geus-Oei LF,Van Krieken JH,Aliredjo RP.Biological correlates of FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer,2007,55(1):79-87.
  • 5[4]Takafumi Mochizuki,Eriko Tsukamoto,Yuji Kuge,et al.FDG Uptake and Glucose Transporter Subtype Expressions in Experimental Tumor and Inflammation Models.J Nucl Med,2001,4(2):1551-1555.
  • 6[5]Minna W.B.pedersen,Eva L.Lund,et al.Coregulation of Glucose Uptake and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Two Small-cell Lung Cancer Sublines in vivo and in vitro.Neoplasia,2001,3(1):80-87.
  • 7[7]Gould MK,Maclean CC,Kuschner WG.Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions:a meta-analysis.JAMA,2001,285(7):936-937.
  • 8[9]Kaim AH,Weber B,Kurrer MO,et al.Autoradiographic quantification of 18F-FDG uptake in experimental soft-tissue abscesses in rats.Radiology,2002,223(2):446-451.
  • 9[10]Jan Thieβ Deichen,Olaf Prante,Michaela Gack,et al.Uptake of[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose.in human monocyte-macrophages in vitro.Eur J Nucl Med,2003,30(1):267-273.
  • 10[11]Mamede M,Higashi T,Kitaichi M,et al.[igF]FDG uptake and PCNA,Glut-1,and Hexokinase-Ⅱ expressions in cancers and inflammatory lesions of the lung.Neoplasia,2005,7(4):369-379.

共引文献16

同被引文献5

  • 1Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer[J]. Chest,1997,111(6):lTlO 1717.
  • 2Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Tanoue LT. The new lung cancer staging system[J]. Chest,2009,136(1):260- 271.
  • 3Choi NC, Fischman AJ, Niemierko A, et al. Dose-response relationship between probability of pathologic tumor control and glucose metabolic rate measured with FDG PET after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002,54(4): 1024-1035.
  • 4Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of lSF-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials[J] J Nucl Med,2006,47(6) :1059-1066.
  • 5李彪.^(18)F-脱氧葡萄糖PET及PET-CT监测非小细胞肺癌放化疗疗效的价值[J].诊断学理论与实践,2010,9(2):129-132. 被引量:2

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部