利/害条件下归纳推理的心理逻辑分离

Different contents different Logic: under the conditions of gaining benefits and avioding injuring

本研究假设:在获利型归纳推理中,人会根据反例修正原来的结论;在避害型归纳推理中,人倾向于忽略反例而坚持原来的结论。本研究用包含反例的归纳推理任务考察了获利型归纳推理和避害型归纳推理的策略。研究结果显示:在获利推理中,推理者对反例数量的变化十分敏感;在避害推理中,推理者对反例数量的变化不敏感。研究得出结论:在两种归纳推理任务中,人们采用了不同的推理策略。这个结论符合领域特殊性的构成标准。

Follow the previous research, this study supposes at first that 1） in the inductive inference of gaining benefits, people will modify the previous conclusion when they find the counterexample; 2） in the inductive inference of avoiding injuring, people will ignore counterexample and insist the former conclusion. This study has explored the different strategies of inductive inference in tasks of gaining benefits and avoiding injuring. As the conclusion, in gaining benefit tasks, people consider the number of counterexamples carefully; on the contrary, in avoiding injuring tasks, people tend to ignore the counterexamples. It suggests that people use different inferent strategies while meeting different inductive inference tasks. This conclusive consists with the definement of domain specificity. So this study suggests stranger envidences than former researchs.