摘要
产业经济学对于市场结构与企业创新是否存在某种相关性一直存在着理论上的争论,垄断和竞争哪一种市场结构能够更好地促进创新始终是一个悬而未决的话题。实践中我国一方面提出要通过企业做大做强促进自主创新、建设创新型国家,另一方面又通过法律等形式对企业垄断行为进行规制。基于知识溢出、技术和市场的不确定性以及产业生命周期等三组外生变量,文章梳理了西方产业组织理论有关“熊彼特-阿罗”争论十年来的最新发展,在此基础上提炼出对我国现阶段反垄断和激励企业创新的政策含义。
The Schumpeter-Arrow controversy focuses on whether monopoly or competition imposes better stimulation on enterprise innovation. However, market structure and enterprise innovation are both endogenetic variables in economic system, and the relationship between them is not simply deciding and decided. Based on three exogenesis variables as knowledge spillover, technology and market uncertainty and industry lifecycle, this paper sorts out the research progress as for Schumpeter-Arrow controversy of Industry Organization (IO) for the past decade, and at the same time it summarizes the research tendency in terms of the dynamic efficiency of monopoly and competition.
出处
《当代经济管理》
2009年第5期14-18,共5页
Contemporary Economic Management
基金
国家社会科学基金项目《中国产业安全链重构:突破跨国“链主”纵向控制的理论和对策研究》(08BJY081)
教育部人文社会科学重大项目《长江三角洲地区R&D的行为模式和技术转移问题研究》(06JJ790018).
关键词
“熊彼特-阿罗”争论
市场结构
企业创新
反垄断
Schumpeter-Arrow controversy
market structure
enterprise innovation
antitrust