1Danesi, M. Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: the neglected dimension [A]. In Alatis, J.E. (ed.). Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press, 1992: 489-500.
2Danesi, M. Wither contrastive analysis [J].The Canadian Modern Language Review, 1993 ( 1): 37-46.
3Danesi, M. Learning and teaching language: The role of conceptual fluency [J]. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1995(1): 3-20.
4Danesi, M. Semiotics in Language Education [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000:39-119.
5Dirven, R. & Virspoor, M. Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998:1-15.
6Gertner, D.; Gertner, D.R. Flowing waters or teeming crowds: mental models of electricity [R]. Report no. 4981, prepared for the Office of Naval Research Personnel and Training Research Programs. Boston: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc, 1982.
7Giora, R. Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothesis [J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1997 (3): 183-206.
8Grabois, H. Distributed cognition and participation in second language discourse [A]. In A. Pavlenko and R. Salaberry (eds.), Comell Working Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 14). Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996:1-24.
9Hunt, E.; Agnoli, F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: a cognitive psychology perspective [J]. Psychological Review, 1991(3): 377-389.
10Irujo, S. Steering clear: avoidance in the production of idioms [J]. IRAL, 1993 (3): 205-219.
9LAKOFF G,JOHNSON M.Metaphors We Live by [M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1980.
10DANESI M.Metaphorical Competence in Second Lan-guage Acquisition and Second Language Teaching:the Neglected Dimension [C]//ALATIS J E.Georgetown U-niversity Round Table on Languages and Linguistics.Washington,D.C:Georgetown University Press,1992.
