1Quanta Computer, Inc., et al. v. LG Electronics, Inc., 128S. Ct. 2109, No. 06-937(2008).
2William C. Robinson, The Law of Patents for Useful Inventions, Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1890, pp. 617 -619.
3Cited from Leonard J. Hope, The Licensed - Foundry Defense in Patent Infringement Cases : Time to Take Some of the Steam out of Patent Exhaustion, Georgia State University Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 3, April 1995, p. 625.
4Mitchell v. Hawley, 83 U. S. 544,548 (1872).
5Adams v. Burke, 84 U. S. 453 ( 1873 ).
6Keller v. Standard Folding - Bed Co., 157 U. S. 659 ( 1895 ).
7Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.,224 U. S. 1, 8(1912).
8Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F. 2d 700(1992).
9United States v. General Electric Co., 272 U. S. 476(1926).
10General Talking Pictures Corp. v. Western Elee. Co., 305 U. S. 124 (1938 ).
二级参考文献56
1Carborundum Co. v. Molten Metal Equipment Innovations, Inc., 72 F.3d 872, 37 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1169 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
5William F. Lee,David B, Bassett,JefFcey C. Morgan: When An Exclusive License is not An Exclusive LiCense: The standing of "Exclusive" Patent Licensees To Sue After Ortho Pharmaceutcal Corp. v. Genetics Institue, InCl [J]Federal Circuit Bar Journal Spring, 1997.Id at 4.
