期刊文献+

司马迁对太史令职责的理解与《史记》写作 被引量:6

Sima Qian's Understanding of Taishiling and His Writing of Shiji
原文传递
导出
摘要 太史令在西汉时期社会地位低下,其主要职责是掌管天文历法;而太史在西周时期则享有尊崇的地位。司马迁父子因为祖上曾是周之太史,因此他们认为西汉的太史令也理应享有太史在周室时的尊崇地位。他们出于对祖先尊崇社会地位的追慕,从而希望通过论载天下"史文"来达到比肩先祖的目的,这正是司马迁写作《史记》的信心所在。但是汉代大一统的政治格局限制了司马迁对历史经验的解读和表达,因此,"亦欲……成一家之言"实际上是司马迁欲比附先祖周之太史的期望与西汉太史公地位卑下之间不对称关系的一种妥协表达。由于司马迁的写史思想和自武帝后占主导地位的儒家思想有所出入,因此,在赵宋之前,"成一家之言"的初衷并没有得到人们的理解和认同。 Taishiling has a low social status. His primary responsibility is to manage the Astronomy and Calendar in the Western Han Dynasty. However, in the Western Zhou Dynasty, Taishi has a high status. Sima Qian' s ancestor is a Taishi in the Western Zhou Dynasty; therefore, Sima Qian and his father consider that Taishiling should have a high social status in the Western Han Dynasty. They are proud of their ancestor's high status, so they consider they can also write the history to get people's respect and have a high social status as their ancestor. This is just his motive of writing Shiji. But the political pattern of unification restricts his understanding and expression of history therefore, a thought of "becoming the single opinion" is actually a compromising expression of dissymmetry relation between the hope that Sima Qian and his father are respected as their ancestor and the fact of Taishiling's low social status. And because Sima Qian's historical thought is different from Confucianism after Emperor Wu in Western Han Dynasty;therefore,before the Song Dynasty, Sima Qian's motive of writing Shiji is not understood and accepted by people.
作者 田瑞文
机构地区 南京大学文学院
出处 《史学月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期113-120,共8页 Journal of Historical Science
关键词 成一家之言 太史 太史令 becoming the single opinion Taishi Taishiling writing narration
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献61

  • 1陈直.汉晋人对史记的传播及其评价[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1957(3):41-57. 被引量:19
  • 2逯耀东.《从隋书经籍志史部形成论魏晋史学转变的历程》[J].食货复刊,1980:121-142.
  • 3《经史分途与史学评论的萌芽》[J].大陆杂志,1985:1-8.
  • 4高步瀛.《史记太史公自序笺证》[J].女师大学术季刊,1930:30-30.
  • 5侯外庐.《中国思想通史》第二册,北京:人民出版社,1957年,第127页.
  • 6阮芝生.《司马迁的史学与历史思想》,台湾大学历史研究所博士学位论文,1973年,第406页.
  • 7张辛.《说左史、右史》,《文献》第20辑,第69-92页.
  • 8徐复观.《原史》,载杜维运,陈锦忠编.《中国史学史论文选辑》第三册,台北:华世出版社,1982年,第1-72页.
  • 9吴昌廉.《两汉计偕考》,台北:兰台出版社,1990年.
  • 10施之勉.《汉书艺文志集释》(五)[J].大陆杂志,:243-243.

共引文献89

同被引文献60

引证文献6

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部