期刊文献+

复句“合乎事理”辨 被引量:13

On "rationality" of compound sentences
原文传递
导出
摘要 复句表达的意思要合乎事理,不能违背事理。以往的复句研究指出,有许多复句之所以不成立是因为违背了事理。本文在对多种汉语复句作深入的考察后发现,复句所遵循的事理除了一般的事理,还有认识的事理和语用的事理。认识的事理包括回推的事理和类推的事理,语用的事理包括言说的事理和会话的事理。 The inferential meaning expressed by compound sentences should be rational and this paper in accordance with Sweester (1990 & 1996) divides 'rationality' of compound sentences into three kinds,i.e. physical rationality, cognitive rationality, and pragmatic rationality. The emphasis lies on the latter two kinds and the data are all from Mandarin Chinese. While the cognitive rationality includes abductive rationality and analogical rationality, the pragmatic rationality includes speech act rationality and conversational rationality.
作者 沈家煊
机构地区 中国社会科学院
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期111-117,共7页 Modern Foreign Languages
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 2Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation [A]. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts [C]. New York: Academic Press. 41-58.
  • 3Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 4Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics : Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Sweetser, E. 1996. Mental spaces and conditional constructions [A]. In G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser (eds.). Spaces, Words, and Gramma [C]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,318-333.
  • 8沈家煊.复句三域“行、知、言”[J].中国语文,2003(3):195-204. 被引量:453
  • 9张斌.蕴涵、预设与句子的理解[J].世界汉语教学,2002,16(3):5-9. 被引量:27

二级参考文献14

  • 1石安石.句义的预设[J].语文研究,1986(2):27-32. 被引量:22
  • 2沈家煊.“语用否定”考察[J].中国语文,1993,(5):321-331.
  • 3王维贤.《论转折句》[J].《中国语言学报》,1991,(4).
  • 4王伟1998.《“能”的个案:现代汉语情态研究的认知维度》,中国社会科学院研究生院语言系硕士论文.
  • 5Bybee, Joan,R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca 1994 The Evolution of Grammar - Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Ducrot, O. 1984 Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.
  • 7Grice, H.P. 1975 Logic and conversation. InCole, P&J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41 - 58.
  • 8Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson 1980 Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 9Lyons, J. 1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Searle, John 1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献476

同被引文献152

引证文献13

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部