期刊文献+

Adsorption of Benzene and Propylene in Zeolite ZSM-5:Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulations 被引量:7

Adsorption of Benzene and Propylene in Zeolite ZSM-5:Grand Canonical Monte Carlo Simulations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The adsorption behavior of benzene and propylene in zeolite ZSM-5 was studied by Grand Canonical Monte Carlo(GCMC) simulations. It could be found that benzene and propylene molecules showed different adsorption behavior in the zeolite cavities. The loadings of propylene were significantly larger than those of benzene at 100 kPa. From the figures of potential energy distribution, the potential energy of benzene/zeolite was more negative than that of propylene/zeolite, so benzene could be adsorbed more stably than propylene. When the temperature was in- creased from 298 to 443 K at 100 kPa, the loading ofpropylene was reduced from 99 to 82 molecules, whereas that of benzene changed little. When benzene and propylene were adsorbed in zeolite simultaneously, the competitive adsorption of them occurred; therefore, the potential energy distribution could be changed significantly. Besides, the adsorption isotherms of benzene and propylene in ZSM-5 at 298 and 443 K were simulated. The results exhibit that the different factors influenced the molecular adsorption at various temperatures and pressures, leading to the diffe- rent rules for the adsorption of benzene and propylene molecules in the zeolite. At a low pressure, the unfavorable energy of propylene/zeolite and the "commensurate freezing" phenomenon of benzene would make the loadings of itself higher than those of propylene. When pressure was higher than 5 kPa, the adsorption of benzene in ZSM-5 would nearly reach saturation. The adsorption behavior of benzene and propylene in zeolite ZSM-5 was studied by Grand Canonical Monte Carlo(GCMC) simulations. It could be found that benzene and propylene molecules showed different adsorption behavior in the zeolite cavities. The loadings of propylene were significantly larger than those of benzene at 100 kPa. From the figures of potential energy distribution, the potential energy of benzene/zeolite was more negative than that of propylene/zeolite, so benzene could be adsorbed more stably than propylene. When the temperature was in- creased from 298 to 443 K at 100 kPa, the loading ofpropylene was reduced from 99 to 82 molecules, whereas that of benzene changed little. When benzene and propylene were adsorbed in zeolite simultaneously, the competitive adsorption of them occurred; therefore, the potential energy distribution could be changed significantly. Besides, the adsorption isotherms of benzene and propylene in ZSM-5 at 298 and 443 K were simulated. The results exhibit that the different factors influenced the molecular adsorption at various temperatures and pressures, leading to the diffe- rent rules for the adsorption of benzene and propylene molecules in the zeolite. At a low pressure, the unfavorable energy of propylene/zeolite and the "commensurate freezing" phenomenon of benzene would make the loadings of itself higher than those of propylene. When pressure was higher than 5 kPa, the adsorption of benzene in ZSM-5 would nearly reach saturation.
出处 《Chemical Research in Chinese Universities》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第3期377-382,共6页 高等学校化学研究(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.20576012 and 20625621)
关键词 ZSM-5 zeolite ADSORPTION Grand canonical monte carlo ZSM-5 zeolite Adsorption Grand canonical monte carlo
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Sastre G., Raj N., Catlow C. R. A., et al., d. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102(17), 3198
  • 2Corma A., Catlow C. R. A., Sastre G., J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102(37), 7085
  • 3Hou T. J., Zhu L. L., Li Y. Y., et al., Acta Chimica Sinica, 2000, 58(10), 1216
  • 4Hou T. J., Zhu L. L., Li Y. Y., et al.,J. Mol. Struct.(Theochem.), 2001, 535(1), 9
  • 5Krishna R., van Baten J. M., Micro. Meso. Mater., 2008, 109(1), 91
  • 6Liu H., Zhang Z., Chen B. H., et al., J. Porous. Mat., 2008, 15(2),119
  • 7Randall Q. S., Alexis T. B., Doros N. T.,J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97(51), 13742
  • 8Treaey M. M. J., Higgins J. B., Collection of Simulated XRD Powder Patterns for Zeolite, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001
  • 9Lowenstein W., American Mineralogist, 1954, 39, 39
  • 10Berendsen H. J. C., Postma J. P. M., Gunsteren W. V., et al., J. Chem. Phys., 1984, 81(3), 3684

同被引文献63

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部