1Blondheim O, Abbasi S, Fox WW. Effect of enteral garage feeding rate on pulmonary functions of very. low birth weight babies. J Pediatr, 1993, 122: 751-755.
2Shiao SY. Comparison of continuous veins intermittent sucking in VLBW infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nus, 1997, 26(3): 313-319.
3Toce SS, Keenan W J, Homan SM. Enteml feeding in very.low birth weight infants. A comparison of two nasogastric methods. AmJ Dis Child, 1987, 141(4): 439-444.
4Parker P, Stroop S, Greene HA controlled comparison of continuous versus intennittend feeding in the treatment of infants with intestinal disease. J Pediatr, 1981, 99: 360-364.
5Silvestre MA, Morbach CA, Brans YW, et at. A prospective randomized trial comparing continuous versus intermittent feeding methods in very. low birth weight neonates. J Pediar,1996, 128: 748-752.
6Schanler RJ. Shulman R J, Lau C, et al. Feeding strategies for premature infants: randomized trial of gastrointestinal priming and tube-feeding method. Pediatrics, 1999, 103:434-439.
7Williams AF. Early enteral feeding of the premature inthnt.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2000, 83: 219-220.
8Silvestre MA, Morbach CA, Brans YW, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing continuous versus intemfittent feeding methods in very low birth weight neonates. J Pediatr,1997, 130(1): 163-164.
9Kennedy KA, Tyson JE, Chamnanvan JS. Rapid versus slow rate of advancement of feedings for promoting growth and preventing necrotzing enterocolitis in parenterally fed low-birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2000 (2), CD001241.
10De ViUe E, Knapp E, Tawil YA, et al. Slow infusion feedings enhance duodenal motor responses and gastric emptying in pretenn infants. Am J Clin Nutr, 1998, 68: 103-108.
