期刊文献+

公平敏感性视角下组织公平感与员工绩效的关系研究 被引量:14

Research On the Relationship between Organizational Justice And Staff Performance From the Visual Angle of Equity Sensitivity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于公平偏好不同,不同类型的员工对三种公平维度的关注程度是不一样的,因而不同维度的公平感对不同类型员工绩效的影响程度也是各不相同的。在分析公平敏感性对员工绩效的影响机制时发现,大公无私型员工不管是在对不公平感的调节方面,还是在组织承诺,以及领导—成员交换关系方面都有良好的表现,并对其绩效产生积极的影响。 Many researches indicated that the organizational justice has the very strong forecast function to the staff performance. But, about the influence of different fairness dimension to the staff performance, the researchers also have the quite great dispute. Based on combing the existing research literature, this paper has analyzed the influence of organizational justice to the staff performance from visual angle of the equity sensitivity, pointed out that the different type staff is dissimilar to concern degrees to three kind of fairness dimension because of different fairness preferences. Therefore the influence of different dimension to the performance of different type staff is also various. When further analyzes influence mechanism of equity sensitivity to the staff performance discovered that no matter in the aspect of adjustment to the sense of unfairness, organizational commitment, as well as the leader-member exchange, the benevolent staff has a good representation, which has the positive influence to his performance.
作者 李强
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期415-420,共6页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词 公平敏感性 组织公平感 员工绩效 equity sensitivity organizational justice staff performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Colquitt, J A & Conlon D E, Wesson M J, Porter C O &Ng K. 2001. “Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research,” Journal of Applied Psychology 86.
  • 2Leventhal, G S, & Karuza J, Fry W R. 1980. “Beyond fairness:A theory of allocation preferences,” In: G Mikula ed. Justice and social interaction. NY.. Springer-Verlag.
  • 3Bies, R J, & Moag J F. 1986. “Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness,”In: Lewicki R J, Sheppard B H, Bazerman M H ed. Research on negotiations in organizations 1. Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
  • 4Colquitt, J A. 2001.“On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure,”Journal of Applied Psychology 86.
  • 5Huseman, R C, Hatfield J D, Miles E W. 1987.“A new perspective on equity theory: the equity sensitivity construct,”Academy of Management Review 12.
  • 6King, W C, Mile E W, Day D D. 1993. "A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct," Journal of Organizational Behavior 14.
  • 7Allen, R S, White C S. 2002. “Equity sensitivity theory: a test of responses to two types of under-reward situations,”Journal of Managerial Issues 14 (4).
  • 8Wheeler,K G. 2002. "Cultural values in relation to equity sensitivity within and across cultures," Journal of Managerial Psychology 17(7).
  • 9Patti, A L, Fok L Y, Hartman S J. 2004. "Differences between managers and line employees in a quality management environment," The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 21(2).
  • 10Greenberg, J. 1993. “The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice,”In:R Cropanzano ed. Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.

同被引文献184

引证文献14

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部