期刊文献+

两种不同方法检测常见过敏原的对比分析 被引量:3

Comparative analysis of common allergen detected by two different methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]使用两种不同方法检测变态反应性疾病患者常见过敏原并将其结果作比较分析。[方法]采用皮肤点刺实验、敏筛方法分别对155例患者同时进行两种方法检测其常见过敏原。[结果]检测的155例变态反应性疾病的患者中,皮肤点刺试验阳性率为88.74%,敏筛法阳性率为86.72%。ST-AS的平均敏感度为95.2%、平均特异性为80.7%、平均诊断效率为90.3%,二者差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。[结论]两种方法之间有着一定的符合性,任选一种方法对变态反应性疾病的诊断和鉴别诊断有重要意义。 [ Objective ] This study used two different methods to detect common allergen from allergic patients and analyzes the results. [ Methods] Skin prick test and allergy screen were used to detect common allergen in 155 patients. [Results] The positive rate of skin prick test and allergen screen were 88.74% and 86.72% respectively in the patients. The average sensitive degree of ST - AS was 95.2%. The average specificity was 80.7%. The average diagnose efficiency was 90.3%. The both methods have significantly correlation (P 〈 0.05). [ Conclusions] The two methods are coincidence each other. Anyone of the two methods is valuable for clinical diagnosis and differential diagnosis of allergic diseases.
出处 《大连医科大学学报》 CAS 2009年第3期346-347,363,共3页 Journal of Dalian Medical University
关键词 变态反应性疾病 皮肤点刺实验 敏筛 特异性IGE allergic disease skin prick test allergy screen specific IgE
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献8

共引文献26

同被引文献27

  • 1谢志贤,刘倩.食物不耐受与相关性疾病[J].中华内科杂志,2006,45(2):150-151. 被引量:257
  • 2韩晗,李孟荣,陈小芳,李昌崇,罗运春,董琳,蔡晓红.温州地区儿童血清特异性过敏原检测的临床意义[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2006,21(9):532-533. 被引量:42
  • 3冯文莉,杨静,张荣丽,王丽.慢性荨麻疹湿疹患者皮肤点刺试验变应原检测结果分析[J].山西医药杂志,2006,35(10):942-943. 被引量:1
  • 4禹卉千,李振鲁,朱钵.慢性荨麻疹患者血清特异性IgE及过敏原检测分析[J].临床皮肤科杂志,2006,35(12):777-778. 被引量:23
  • 5国家食品药品监督管理局.关于印发《体外诊断试剂临床研究技术指导原则及<体外诊断试剂说明书编写指导原则》的通知[EB/OL].http:WWW.sda.gov.cn/wsol/c10059/9420.html.2010-08-24.
  • 6Fischer R,Mc Ghee JR,Vu HL,et al. Oral and nasal sensitization promote distinct immune responses and lung reactivity in a mouse model of peanut allergy [J]. Am J Pathol, 2005,167 (6) : 1621-1630.
  • 7Pitk~nen E. Mannose ,mannitol ,fructose and 1,5-an- hydroglucitol concentrations measured by gas chro- matography/mass spectrometry in blood plasma of diabetic patients[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 1996,251 (1): 91-103.
  • 8Ileana H, Nicole B, Werner K, et al. Diagnostic and analytical performance of a screening panel for allergy [J], Clin Chem Lab Mcd, 2005, 43(9): 963-966.
  • 9Krouse JH, Stachler RJ, Shah A. Current in vivo and vitro screens for inhalant allergy [J]. Otolarynol Clin North Am, 2003, 36(5): 855-868.
  • 10King M J, Lockey RF. Allergen prick-puncture skin testing in the elderly [J]. Drugs Aging, 2003, 20(14): 1011-1017.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部