期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

准备时间和语言水平对中国学生写作准确性的影响 被引量：3

The Influence of Planning Time and Language Proficiency on Learners' Written Accuracy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过分析20名高水平非英语专业大学生和20名低水平非英语专业大学生在有、无准备时间的条件下完成一项图片写作任务中的文字材料,考察了准备时间和语言水平对中国学生写作表达的准确性的影响。研究发现,准备时间和语言水平对写作表达的准确性均具有显著影响;准备时间和语言水平无交互效应。 Based on an investigation of the performance of 20 high learners and 20 low learners in a written task with/without planning time, we analyzed the influence of planning time and language proficiency on learners＇ written accuracy. Results show that： 1） planning time has significant influence on written accuracy; 2） language proficiency has significant impacts upon written accuracy; and 3） there is no interaction between planning time and language proficiency.
作者 牟宜武 范振东
机构地区 兰州交通大学外国语学院 南昌航空大学外国语学院
出处 《长春理工大学学报（社会科学版）》 2009年第3期502-504,共3页 Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology（Social Sciences Edition）
关键词 准备时间 语言水平 写作准确性 planning time language proficiency written accuracy
分类号 H319.3 [语言文字—英语]
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Ellis R,Yuan F.The effects of planning on fluency,complexity,and accuracy in second language narrative writing[J].Studies in Second Language Acquisition,2003,26:59-84.
  • 2Gilabert R.The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and(+/-here-and-now):effects on L2 oral production[A]//G Mayo,M Pilar(Eds.),Investigating tasks in formal language learning.Multilingual Matters Limited,2006:44-68.
  • 3Heaton J.Writing English Language Tests[M].Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2000.
  • 4Kuiken F,Vedder I.Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing[A]//G Mayo,M Pilar(Eds.).Investigating tasks in formal language learning.Multilingual Matters Limited,2006:136-156.
  • 5Skehan P.A cognitive approach to language learning[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1998.
  • 6Yuan F,Ellis R.The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency,complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production[J].Applied Linguistics,2003,24:1-27.
  • 7邵继荣.任务类型和任务条件对EFL写作的影响[J].国外外语教学,2003(2):28-34. 被引量：52

二级参考文献15

  • 1陈慧媛,吴旭东.任务难度与任务条件对EFL写作的影响[J].现代外语,1998,21(2). 被引量：103
  • 2阮周林.第二语言学习中回避现象分析[J].外语教学,2000,21(1):19-23. 被引量：77
  • 3Crookes, G. 1989. "Planning and interlanguage variation". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11/3: 367-383.
  • 4Crookes, G. 1990. "The utterance, and the other basic units for second language discourse analysis~. Applied Linguistics 11 : 183-199.
  • 5Doughty, C. 1991. "Second language instruction does make a difference, evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13/4 : 431 - 470.
  • 6Ellis, R. 1987. "Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: style shifting in the use of the past tense". Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9 ; 12-20.
  • 7Foster, P. & P. Skehan. 1996. "The influence of planning and task type on second language performanee ". Studies in Second language Acquisition 18:299-323.
  • 8Long, M. 1991. "Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching". In K. de Bot, R.B. Ginsberg & C. Kramsch ( eds. ). Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 9Perron, J. 1977. "Written syntactic complexity and the modes of discourse'. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  • 10Schachter, J. 1974. "An error in error analysis". Language Learning 24 : 205- 214.

共引文献51

同被引文献38

  • 1乔丽娟.任务特性对意义协商质与量的影响[J].外语学刊,2007(3):137-139. 被引量：11
  • 2Arnold, E. Measurements and perceptions of writing development: Omani academic writers in English[ J]. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2008,4( 1 ) : 42-55.
  • 3Bygate, M. Quality of language and purpose of task : Patterns of learn- ers' language on two oral communication tasks[ J]. Language Teach- ing Research, 1999(3) : 185-214.
  • 4Ellis, R. & Yuan, F. The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing[ J ]. Studies in Sec- ond Language Acquisition, 2004(26) : 59-84.
  • 5Hunt, K. Recent measures in syntactic development[ A]. In Lester, M. (ed.). Reading in Applied Transformational Grammar[ C]. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970: 179-192.
  • 6Ishikawa, T. The effect of manipulating task complexity along the ( + Here-and-Now) dimension on L2 written narrative discourse[ A 1. In C. M. Garcia-Mayo (ed.). Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning[C]. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 2006: 136-156.
  • 7Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing [ J 1. International Review of Applied Lin- guistics, 2007 (45) : 261-284.
  • 8Kuiken, F. & Vedder, I. Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2008( 17 ): 48-60.
  • 9Larsen-Freeman, D. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accu- racy in the oral and written production of five Chinese leamers of Eng- lish[J]. Applied Linguistics, 2006, 27(4): 590-619.
  • 10Long, M. H. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition[A]. In W. Ritchie and T. Bhatia(eds. ). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [ C ]. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996 : 413-4-68.

二级引证文献52

长春理工大学学报（社会科学版）
2009年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部