WTF和ITF在北京部分跆拳道俱乐部的开展现状分析

An analysis on the current situation of the WTF and ITF developing in Beijing Taekwondo Clubs

对北京市部分跆拳道俱乐部会员和教练员进行调查,对比WTF和ITF两种跆拳道形式的开展比例、学员动机、教练员技术特点、场地设施以及两种跆拳道自身风格的差异,结果显示:所调查俱乐部中6成以WTF教学为主,4成以ITF教学为主;就学员学习动机而言搏击跆拳道具有更广的受众;教练员多为竞技跆拳道出身,虽利于竞技跆拳道的推广但同时制约了搏击跆拳道的开展;跆拳道的场地设施情况基本能满足竞技跆拳道开展的需要,搏击跆拳道的开展还需在设施上加以完善;就安全性而言WTF更利于开展。

After investigated the coaches and members in some taekwondo clubs of Beijing, and compared the differences of WTF and ITF in developing proportion, motivation, technical characteristics of coach, facilities and their Styles, we get the results that the WIT is 60% and ITF is 40% in all investigated clubs＇ teaching; about the study motivation, the WTF is more popular than ITF; ＂although most of the coaches are from the ITF, which is benefit for the ITF＇s popularization, it restricts the WTF＇s developing; the available facilities can meet the challenge of the ITF, and the safety of WTF is propitious to it＇s developing.