期刊文献+

管理层讨论与分析信息披露制度的跨国比较及借鉴 被引量:3

Cross-country Comparison on the Evolvement of MD&A and Advice on How to Improve It in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "管理层讨论与分析"作为上市公司对外披露的信息中最具价值的部分,对提高公司信息披露质量起着至关重要的作用。研究MD&A的披露质量,既是监管部门和投资者都非常关心的问题,也是今后进一步完善MD&A披露制度首先要了解的问题。本文对美国、英国等发达国家"管理层讨论与分析"信息披露制度的历史发展过程、重要法规、现实问题以及未来发展方向等进行阐述,比较分析了各国MD&A信息披露制度的框架体系及相互间的差异,在此基础上对我国MD&A信息披露制度提出了建设性的建议。 As the most important valuable among the information disclosured by the listed companies,Management’s Discussion & Analysis(MD&A) plays an vital influence on improving quality of information disclosure . This paper is intended to analyze the reason that give rise to this disclosure requirement, the process, important laws, material case, reality problem and forward direction of American and British ,compare the diversity of different framework, and give feasible advice on howto improve it in China.
出处 《财会通讯(下)》 2009年第5期64-66,70,共4页 Communication of Finance and Accounting
基金 国家自然科学基金"上市公司定期报告管理层讨论与分析信息披露理论与实证研究"(G0205-70572092) 2006年度教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划"上市公司财务信息披露质量研究"(NCET-06-0565) 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"基于公司治理的股利政策研究"(07JJD630009)阶段性成果
关键词 管理层讨论与分析 信息披露 国际比较 MD&A information disclosure Cross-country comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李常青,王毅辉.“管理层讨论与分析”研究述评[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,57(5):20-26. 被引量:24
  • 2王啸.美国“管理层讨论与分析”及对我国的借鉴[J].证券市场导报,2002(8):24-28. 被引量:21
  • 3李常青,李锋森.美国“管理层讨论与分析”的审计制度及对我国的借鉴[J].审计研究,2006(1):93-96. 被引量:13
  • 4Cathy J.C ole and C hristopherLJones.The usefulness ofM D&A Disclosures in the RetailIndustryJournal ofAccounting,Auding& Finanee,2004.
  • 5John W.Bagby and Philip L.Kintzele, Management Discussion and Analysis:Discretionary Disclosures and The Business Segement. Accounting Horizons, 1987.
  • 6U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Commission Statement about Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditi3n and Results of Operations. Securities Act Release, 2002.
  • 7John W. Bagby and Philip L. Kintzele, Management Discussion of Business Performance:an analytical and empirical evaluation. American Business Law Journal, 1988.
  • 8U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission.Notice of adoption of amendment to Guide 22 and adoption of Guide 1 Securities Act Release, 1972.
  • 9U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission.Notice of adoption of amendment to Guide 22 and adoption of Guide 1.Securities Act Release, 1974.
  • 10U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Amendments to annual report form, related forms, rules, regulations and guides. Securities Act Release, 1980.

二级参考文献29

  • 1李常青,王毅辉等.2005,“管理层讨论与分析:借给投资者的一双慧眼”,《上海证券报》11月24日.
  • 2Epstein, Marc J and Moses L. Pava. Shareholders' Perceptions of the Usefulness of MD&As. Managerial Finance, 21, 68-83. 1995.
  • 3US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Rdease No.4936,December 9, 1968.
  • 4US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).Release No. 5520,August 14, 1974.
  • 5US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Release No. 6231,September 2, 1980.
  • 6US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Release No. 6711,April 21, 1987.
  • 7US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Release Nos. 8040, December 12, 2001.
  • 8US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Release Nos. 8098, May 14, 2002.
  • 9US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Rdease No. 8350, December 29, 2003.
  • 10Summary by the Division of Corporation Finance of Significant Issues Addressed in the Review of the Periodic Reports of the Fortune 500 Companies. February 23, 2003.

同被引文献44

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部