期刊文献+

基于“家族理性”的家族企业公司治理分析 被引量:2

基于"家族理性"的家族企业公司治理分析
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现实生活中"个人理性"经常不符合经济人的选择行为,特别是在传统观念还极强的中国家族企业内部,家族成员对决策的选择往往受到"家族理性的制约"。家族理性具有"利他主义"的特征。在家族企业决策过程中,家族理性强调的是,个人利益要服从家族的整体利益,家族中的个人利益的取舍必须依照家族理性的整体判断,其个人的经济行为也必须符合依家族理性的判断而形成的行为要求。"家族理性"的假设符合现实生活中家族成员的某些政策决策。产权不清晰、对职业经理人的不信任等都是家族企业无奈又理性的选择。 "Family rationality" is a western basic assumption of economics. Western economics figures that the pursuit of maximize personal benefit is the "rational" individuals, people are serf- serving. But in real life "personal reason" people are often not in line with the economic choice behavior. Especially in the Chinese family finns which traditional concept is very strong. Family members make decision are often correlation with "rational family constraints". Decision-making process in the family business, the family of rational stress that personal interests should be subordinated to the overall interests of the family, personal interests in accordance with the family of rational choice must be judged as a whole, the economic behavior of individuals must also be consistent with rational judgments in accordance with the family form of conduct. "Family rationality "hypothesis is in hne with the real - life family decision - making of certain policies. Property rights are not clear, no confidence with professional managers in the family business. All these are rational choice.
作者 何恒
机构地区 浙江工商大学
出处 《黑龙江对外经贸》 2009年第5期60-62,共3页 Heilongjiang Foreign Economic Relations and Trade
关键词 家族理性 家族企业 公司治理 family rationality family finn corporation govemance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1张维迎,吴有昌,马捷.公有制经济中的委托人—代理人关系:理论分析和政策含义[J].经济研究,1995,30(4):10-20. 被引量:374
  • 2费方域.两权分离、代理问题和公司治理[J].上海经济研究,1996,8(8):42-45. 被引量:68
  • 3张维迎.所有制、治理结构及委托—代理关系———兼评崔之元和周其仁的一些观点[J].经济研究,1996,31(9):3-15. 被引量:1551
  • 4翁淑育.[D].辅仁大学金融研究所,2000,6月.
  • 5巴泽尔.《产权的经济分析》中译本[M].上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1999..
  • 6Bai, C E , Liu, Q , Lu, J , Song, F M , and Zhang, J x, 2002, Corporate Governance and Finn Valuations in China, The University of Hong Kong, Working paper, November.
  • 7Bebchuk, L, Kraakman, R, and Triantis, G., 1998, Stock Pyramids, Crass-ownership and Dual Equity: the Creation and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash Flow Rights, Harvard Law School Working paper.
  • 8Berghe, L A A V , and Carchon, S , 2002, Corporate Govemance Practices in Flemish Family Businesses, Vleick Leuven Gent Management School Working paper.
  • 9Chami, R, 1999, What' s Different About Family Business? NBER Working paper, October.
  • 10Claessens, S, Djankov, S., and Lang, L H P, 2000, The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations, Journal of Financial Economies, 58: 81-112.

共引文献726

同被引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部