期刊文献+

激烈竞争下的变革:公司法判例法方法的引入 被引量:2

Competition and Change:Introduction of Case Law into Chinese Company Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国《公司法》2005年的修改拉开了公司法现代化的序幕。在大量借鉴和引入西方先进公司法制度的同时,我们应审视我国公司法发展和变革轨迹。目前,西方国家公司法发展和竞争的良好态势使学习和借鉴一些判例法国家的先进公司法律制度成为首选,但是,一味将这些属于舶来品的制度进行盲目借鉴,必将导致产生一些不可预知的后果,我国的公司法改革也将可能因此而误入歧途。这就有必要在我国现有公司成文法体系的基础上,适时引入产生先进公司法律制度的方法和途径即判例法方法,以有效推进有中国特色公司法的改革,使我国公司法既能满足自身制度发展的内在需求,也能够沉着应对潜在的区域公司法的制度性竞争,为今后我国公司法的不断改进和迅速发展奠定良好的体系性基础。 The re4vision of the Companies Act in 2005 triggered off the modernization of Chinese company law. While introducing advanced western company law concepts and ideas, we must take into account our own way to develop and reform. The evolution and competitive advancement of company law in western countries is worth referring and learning for China. However, transplantation and introduction without differentiation or selection might lead to unexpected consequences and might cause the reform of company law go astray. Thus, it is suggested that we should, to some extent, introduce case law that has yielded advanced company law in common law countries in hopes of effectively improving the company law with the Chinese characteristics. More importantly, by adopting case law method, we expect that our company law being reformed not only satisfy the inner need of development of the legal system, but also well meet the potential regional institutional competition so as to lay a solid foundation for future development of company law.
作者 刘乃睿
机构地区 西南政法大学
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第3期175-185,共11页 Modern Law Science
关键词 公司法 成文法 判例法 普通法 法律改革 法律体系 company law statutory law case law common law legal reform legal system
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1Leo E.Strine,Jr..The Inescapably Empirical Fundation of the Common Law of Corporations[J].Delaware Journal of Corporate Law(2002),499.
  • 2陈大刚,魏群.论判例法方法在我国法制建设中的借鉴作用[J].比较法研究,1988,2(1):1-11. 被引量:17
  • 3Sebastian Mock.Perspectives of Regulatory Competition in European Company Law[J].06(04)German Law Journal(2005),773.
  • 4Robem Romano.The Advantage of Competitive Federalism for Securities Regulation[M].Washington:AEI Press(2002),63.
  • 5David Charny.Competing among Jurisdictions in Formulating Corporate Law Rules:An American Perspective on the"Race to the Bottom"in the European Communities[J].32 Harvard International Law Journal(1991),423.
  • 6Jean J.du Plessis and Otto Sandrock.The Rise and the Fall of Supervisory Codetermination in Germany[J].International Company and Commercial Law Review(2005),76.
  • 7Henry Hansman and Reinier Kraakman.The End of History for Corporate Law[J].89 Georgetown Law Journal (2001),440.
  • 8保罗.勒嘉钕,孙涛.向所有人开放的简化股份公司(SAS)[J].法学家,2000(4):122-127. 被引量:6
  • 9布井千博.日本公司法的美国法化[M]//王保树.于敏,杨东,译.最新日本公司法.北京:法律出版社,2006:28-35.
  • 10Michael Beurskens and Ulrich Noack.The Reform of German Private Limited Company:Is the GmbH Ready for the 21st Century?[J].09(09)German Law Journal(2008).1072.

二级参考文献55

  • 1《荀子·王制》,北京燕山出版社,1995年.
  • 2Easterbrook F, Fischel D. Limited Lability & the Corporation[ J ]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 1985 (52) : 89 - 117.
  • 3Hodge L, Sachs A. Piercing the Mist:Bringing the Thompson Study into the 1990s[ J]. Wake Forest Law Review,2008 (43) :341 - 363.
  • 4Bainbridge S. Abolishing Veil Piercing[J] .The Journal of Corporation Law,2001(26):479- 535.
  • 5Bainbridge S. Symposium : Uncorporation : A New Age? Abolishing LLC Veil Piercing[ C ]. Illinois : University of Illinois ,2005:77 - 106.
  • 6Singhof B. Equity Holders' Liability for Limited Liability Companies' Unrecoverable Debts - Reflections on Piercing the Corporate Veil Under German Law[J]. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 1999(22):143- 174.
  • 7Thompson R.Piercing the Corporate Veil:An Empirical Study[J] .ComeU Law Review, 1991 (76):1036- 1074.
  • 8Rapp G. Preserving LLC Veil Piercing: A Response to Bainbridge [ J ]. Iowa Journal of Corporation Law, 2006 (31 ) : 1063 - 1096.
  • 9Presser S. Symposium: The First Century: Celebrating 100 Years of Legal Scholarship: Tile Bogalusa Explosion, “Single Business Enterprise,” “Alter Ego, and other Errors : Academics, Economics, Democracy, and ”Shareholder Limited Liability : Back Towards a Unitary “Abuse” Theory of Piercing the Corporate Veil[ J ]. Northwestern University Law Review, 2006 ( 1 O0 ) : 405 - 435.
  • 10Moore M.“A Temple Built On Faulty Foundations”: Piercing the Corporate Veil and the Legacy of Salomon v. Salomon [ J]. Journal of Business Law ,2006 (MAR) : 180 - 203.

共引文献45

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部