期刊文献+

论会计趋同化与差异性 被引量:11

Viewpoint on Accounting Convergence and Divergence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 经济全球化和国际资本市场的持续发展,迫切需要会计信息可比性的提高,会计全球趋同遂成为跨国上市和发行证券及其监管的必然要求。会计趋同首先是形式趋同,即准则层面的趋同。会计形式趋同能否带来实质趋同,即会计实务的一致和会计信息的可比?移植的国际财务报告准则(IFRS)及与国际趋同的国家会计准则是否能够得到有效、一致的执行?特别是国际金融危机的爆发,引发了新一轮国家保护主义思潮。受到金融危机重创的国家,其企业在执行国际趋同的准则中极可能存在操纵行为,从而在一定程度上消减准则趋同的效果。为此,本文探讨了会计趋同化以及与之密切相关的差异性问题,并对本领域的研究及进展予以简要回顾,以期提起准则趋同下会计差异性的认识。 The continuous development of economic globalization and international capital market urges the improvement of accounting information comparability. Accounting global convergence became the inevitable requirement of cross-listing, issuing and supervision. Firstly, accounting convergence is format convergence, i.e. the convergence of standards. Will accounting format convergence leads to material convergence, i. e. the consistency of accounting practice and the comparability of accounting information? Will adopted IFRS and internationally converged national accounting standards be implemented effectively and consistently? Especially after explosion of monetary crisis, the new national protection emerged. In those countries badly damaged by monetary crisis, firms are likely to manipulate while implementing internationally converged accounting standards, in order to reduce the effects of converged accounting standards. Therefore, for arousing the attention on accounting divergence underlying standards convergence, this article discusses accounting convergence and closely related issues in divergence, and also briefly reviews the study and development.
作者 曲晓辉
出处 《上海立信会计学院学报》 北大核心 2009年第3期3-8,共6页 Journal of Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(08JJD630010)
关键词 会计 趋同 差异 等效 accounting convergence divergence equivalence
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1Van der Tas, L. G.. Measuring harmonisation of financial reporting practice [ J ]. Accounting and Business Research,1988,18(70) : 157 - 169.
  • 2Archer, G S H, S J McLeay. On measuring the harmonization of accounting practices [ R ]. Geneva: the Workshop on International Accounting, 1995.
  • 3Archer, G S H, P Delvaille, S J McLeay. The measurement of harmonization and the comparability of financial statement items: within-country and betweencountry effects [ J ]. Accounting and Business Research, 1995,25 : 67 - 80.
  • 4Krisement, V. An approach for measuring the degree of comparability of financial accounting information [ J ]. The European Accounting Review, 1997,6 ( 3 ) : 465 - 485.
  • 5McLeay, S, D Ncal, T Tollington. International standardization and harmonization: a new measurement technique[ J ]. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 1999,10 ( 1 ) : 42 -70.
  • 6Morris, R D, R H Parker. International harmony measures of accounting policy: comparative statistical properties[J]. Accounting and Business Research, 1998, 29 (1) : 73 -86.
  • 7Aisbitt, S. Measurement of harmony of financial reporting within and between countries : the case of the Nordic countries [ J ]. European Accounting Review, 2001,10(1) : 51 -72.
  • 8Pierce, A, P Weetman. Measurement of de facto harmonization: implications of non-disclosurc for research planning and interpretation [ J]. Accounting and Business Research, 2002,32 (4) : 259 - 273.
  • 9Murphy, A B. The Impact of Adopting International Accounting Standards on the Harmonization of Account- ing Practices[J]. The International Journal of Accounting, 2000,35(4) : 471 -493.
  • 10Parker, R H, R D Morris. The influence of U. S. GAAP on the harmony of accounting measurement poli- cies of large companies in the U.K. and Australia[ J]. Abacus, 2001,37(3) : 297-328.

二级参考文献138

共引文献260

引证文献11

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部