期刊文献+

两种不同被动式自锁托槽摩擦力的实验研究 被引量:4

An experimental study on frictional resistances of two different passive self-ligating brackets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨2种被动式自锁托槽系统(SmartClip,Damon3)分别和不同弓丝组合时在后牙段所产生的摩擦力差异。方法:24℃及干燥条件下,分别测试这2种被动自锁托槽系统与3种弓丝(0.36mm NiTi圆丝、0.48mm×0.64mmN iTi方丝、0.48mm×0.64mm不锈钢方丝)组合时在后牙段的动、静摩擦力。结果:当使用0.36mm NiTi圆丝时,SmartClip与Damon3自锁托槽的摩擦力相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。当使用0.48mm×0.64mm NiTi方丝和不锈钢方丝时,SmartClip与Damon3自锁托槽的摩擦力相比差异有显著性(P<0.05),并且SmartClip大于Damon3自锁托槽的摩擦力。结论:SmartClip自锁托槽可以有效调节摩擦力大小,在使用较小尺寸弓丝时可达到同Damon3自锁托槽相似的低摩擦力效果,当放入0.48mm×0.64mm以上的方丝时摩擦力迅速增加。 Objective: To study the differences of the frictional resistances of two kinds of passive self-ligating brackets ( SmartClip, Damon3 ) coupled with 3 types of archwires. Methods : The static and kinetic frictions of different combinations of 2 kinds of passive self- ligating brackets ( Damon3, SmartClip) coupled with 3 types of archwires (0.36 mm inch nickel- titanium archwires, 0.48 mm ×0.64 mm nickel- titanium arehwires, 0.48 mm × 0.64 mm stainless steel archwires) in the posterior teeth segment were tested in the dry enviroment and at the stable temperature of 24 ℃. Results:When 0.36 mm nickel-titanium arehwires were used,the frictional resistance of SmartClip and Damon3 bracket had no significant difference( P 〉 0.05 ). When 0.48 inm × 0.64 mm stainless steel archwires were used, they had significant difference(P 〈 0.05) , and the frictional resistance of SmartClip self-ligating bracket was higher than that of Damon3 self-ligating bracket. When 0.48 mm × 0.64 mm nickel-titanium archwires were used, the frictional resistance of SmartClip and Damon3 bracket also had significant difference(P 〈 0.05 ) , and the frictional resistance of SmartClip self-ligating bracket was higher than that of Damon3 self-ligating bracket, too. Conclusion:SmartClip bracket can adjust the friction efficiently. SmartClip bracket can have a low frictional resistance as Damon3. When 0.48 mm× 0.64 mm inch arehwire is used, frictional resistance immediately increases.
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期331-334,共4页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 自锁托槽 静摩擦力 动摩擦力 Self- ligating bracket Static friction Kinetic friction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1朱鲲,王春玲,王娟,赵艳红.FAS自锁托槽与传统自锁托槽的摩擦力对比研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2007,25(4):371-374. 被引量:10
  • 2Ireland AJ,Sherriff M,McDonald F.Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces[J].Eur J Orthod,1991,13(4):322-328.
  • 3Franco D J,Spiller RE,Fraunhofer JA.Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations[J].Angle Orthod,1995,65(1):63-2.
  • 4Newton JT,Edwards JC.Psychometric properties of the modified dental anxiety scale:An nidependent replication[J].Commun Dent Health,2005,22(1):40-42.
  • 5Drescher D,Bourauel C,Schumacher HA.Friction forces between bracket and archwire[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1989,96 (5):397-404.
  • 6Edwards GD,Davies EH,Jones SP,et al.The ex vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets and archwires[J].Br J Orthod,1995,22(2):145-153.
  • 7Downing A,Mecabe J.A study of frictional forces between brackets and archwires[J].Br J Orthod,1994,21 (4):349-357.
  • 8牛百平.全新的正畸概念——Damon系统 第一部分 Damon系统的基本特点[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2008,24(4):608-611. 被引量:11
  • 9Pizzoni L,Ravnholt G,Melsen B.Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets[J].Eur J Orthod,1998,20(3):283-291.
  • 10Thomas S,Sherriff M,Birnie D.A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures[J].Eur J Orthod,1998,20(5):589-596.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Proffit WR.Contemporary orthodontics[M].2nd ed.St Louis:C V Mosby,2000:345.
  • 2Rabinowicz E.Friction and wear of materials[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons,1965:244.
  • 3Thomas S,Sherriff M,Birnie D.A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of seff-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures[J].Eur J Orthod,1998,20(5):589-596.
  • 4Kapur R,Sinha PK,Nanda RS.Frictional resistance of the Damon SL bracket[J].J Clin Orthod,1998,32(8):485-489.
  • 5Pizzoni L,Ravnholt G,Melsen B.Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets[J].Eur J Orthod,1998,20(3):283-291.
  • 6Ireland AJ,Sherriff M,McDonald F.Effect of bracket and wire composition on frictional forces[J].Eur J Orthod,1991,13 (4):322-328.
  • 7Shivapuja PK,Berger J.A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1994,106(5):472-480.
  • 8Sims AP,Waters NE,Birnie DJ,et al.A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation[J].Eur J Orthod,1993,15(5):377-385.
  • 9Harradine NWT.Current products and practices self-ligating brackets:Where are we now[J].J Orthod,2003,30(3):262-273.
  • 10Eberting JJ,Straja SR,Tuncay OC.Treatment time,outcome and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets[J].Clin Orthod Res,2001,4(4):228-234.

共引文献19

同被引文献41

  • 1姜若萍.自锁托槽矫治技术与高效矫治[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,2(1):16-20. 被引量:24
  • 2傅民魁.目前临床正畸矫正技术的几个热点[J].口腔正畸学,2006,13(1):1-2. 被引量:12
  • 3王大为,张晟,谢永建,麦理想,张弘,朱双林,卢新华.安氏Ⅱ类2分类错(牙合)的临床矫治[J].口腔正畸学,2007,14(2):92-96. 被引量:32
  • 4Paduano S, Cioffi I, Iodice G, et al. Time efficiency of self- ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: Effect of appliances and ligating systems [ J ]. Prog Orthod, 2008,9 (2) :74 -80.
  • 5Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self- ligating brackets : Effects of archwire size and material [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2007,131 ( 3 ) : 395 - 399.
  • 6Pringle AM, Petrie A, Cunningham SJ, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels associated with 2 orthodontic fixed bracket systems [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ,2009,136 ( 2 ) : 160 - 167.
  • 7Tecco S, D'Attilio M, Tete S, et al. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment[J]. EHr J Orthod,2009,31 (4) :380 -384.
  • 8Pellegrini P, Sauerwein R, Finlayson T,et al. Plaque retention by self-ligating vs elastomeric orthodontic brackets: Quantitative comparison of oral bacteria and detection with adenosine triphosphate-driven bioluminescence [ J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009,135 ( 4 ) :426. e1- 426. e9.
  • 9Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1994,106 ( 5 ) :472 - 480.
  • 10Ehsani S, Mandich MA, El-Biaty TH, et al. Frictional resistance in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A systematic review[ J]. Angle Orthod, 2009,79 ( 3 ) : 592 - 601.

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部