期刊文献+

“新校正”非“林校”说 被引量:3

The “New Collation” Is Not Made by “Lin Yi”
原文传递
导出
摘要 “新校正”是《内经素问》中北宋校书者所作注文的冠语。明清以来学者无不以为它出于林亿等人之手,故有简称“林校”之说。本文作者首次提出,“新校正”是孙兆对林亿等《补注黄帝内经素问》作再一次重新校正时使用的称谓,是用来与林亿等的校注相区别的标志;并从校注的条文总数、校注写作的年代与孙兆作“新校正”的可能性等方面,作了必要的论证。 The term “new collation” was used by those collators in Northern Song Dynasty as one of headings when they made correction and annotations to the book entitled Plain Questions, Yellow Emperor's Internal Classic. Since Ming and Qing dynasties, all the scholars in TCM have held that the content under the heading is from Lin Yi and others, and so the heading has also been called “Lin's collation”. The author of this paper points out for the first time, that the “new collation” is one of the headings used by Sun Zhao when he made collation and annotations to the book entitled Plain Questions, Yellow Emperor's Internal Classic with Supplements and Annotations by Lin Yi and others. Sun Zhao used the heading in order to distinguish his works from those done by Lin Yi and others. Necessary proofs are offered by the author in this paper to support his viewpoint.
作者 王玉川
机构地区 北京中医药大学
出处 《北京中医药大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1998年第2期2-4,共3页 Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词 中国医学史 内经素问 新校正 林亿 Chinese History of Medicine Plain Questions, Yellow Emperor's Internal Classic New Collation Lin Yi Sun Zhao
  • 相关文献

同被引文献16

  • 1周学鹰.汉代高台建筑技术研究[J].考古与文物,2006(4):66-72. 被引量:6
  • 2王玉川,中医刊授自学之友,1987年,1期,4页
  • 3李今庸,读古医书随笔,1984年,129页
  • 4明·徐春甫.古今医统大全[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1991:166.
  • 5陈垣.校勘学释例.北京:中华书局,1959.145.
  • 6宋·唐慎微.重修政和经史证类备用本草.台北:南天书局有限公司影印,1976:547.
  • 7宋·苏颂.苏魏公文集.王同策,管成学,颜中其,等,点校.北京:中华书局,2004:995.
  • 8黄帝内经素问.台北:天宇出版社,1989:4-6.
  • 9辞源.北京:商务印书馆,1997:758.
  • 10宋·苏东坡东坡全集.长春:吉林出版集团,2006:389-390.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部