期刊文献+

硬膜外镇痛联合导乐陪伴在全程分娩中的应用 被引量:19

Application of epidural analgesia combined with doula in labor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估硬膜外镇痛联合导乐陪伴(助产士陪伴)用于全程分娩的效果。方法300例初产妇进入产程潜伏期后实施分娩镇痛联合导乐陪伴(A组)、单用分娩镇痛(B组)和单用导乐陪伴(C组),每组100例。记录镇痛效果(VAS)、神经阻滞评分(MBS)、满意度评分、产程、分娩方式、催产素的使用、新生儿Apgar评分及不良反应。结果A和B组镇痛后30minVAS评分显著低于镇痛前[(0.9±0.6)分和(1.0±0.5)分vs.(7.6±1.2)分和(7.4±1.4)分](P<0.01)。A组产妇满意度显著高于B组和C组[(98.2±3.0)分vs.(85.2±5.8)分和(83.6±6.1)分](P<0.05)。A组及C组第一、二产程均短于B组(P<0.05)。结论硬膜外镇痛联合导乐陪伴用于分娩全程,镇痛效果确切,并可缩短产程。 Objective To evaluate the outcomes of epidural analgesia combined with doula (accompanied by midwife) for labor analgesia. Methods Three hundred nulliparous parturients were assigned to three groups with 100 cases each. Epidural analgesia combined with doula was used in group A, epidural analgesia alone in group B and doula alone in group C. The visual analogue scale (VAS) ,modified Bromage score (MBS), maternal satisfaction, duration of labor, mode of deliveries, oxytocin consumption and neonatal Apgar score were recorded. Results VAS scores in group A and B were significantly lower at 30 min during analgesia than those before [ (0. 9 ± 0. 6)scores and (1.0 ± 0.5)scores vs. (7.6±1.2) scores and(7.4± 1.4) scores](P〈0.01). The maternal satisfaction score was significantly higher in group Athan that in group B or group C[(98. 2±3.0)scores vs. (85.2± 5.8)scores or(83.6±6.1)scores] (P〈0.05). Duration of the first and second stages in group A and C was significantly shorter than that in group B(P〈0.05). Conclusion The epidural analgesia combined with doula for labor analgesia can provide effective analgesia and shorten the labor course.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期403-405,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 硬膜外镇痛 分娩镇痛 引导分娩 Epidural analgesia Labor analgesia Labor, induced
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Van de Velde M,Dreelinck R,Dubois J,et al.Determination of the full dose-response relation of intrathecal bupivacaine,levobupivacaine,and ropivacaine,combined with sufentanil,for labor analgesia.Anesthesiology,2007,106:149-156.
  • 2Ohel G,Gonen R,Vaida S,et al.Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor:does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial Am J Obstet Gynecol,2006,194:600-605.
  • 3Wong CA,Scavone BM,Peaceman AM,et al.The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor.N Engl J Med,2005,352:655-665.
  • 4庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮,主编.现代麻醉学.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:2610-2612.
  • 5徐世琴,沈晓凤,赵青松,袁红梅.硬膜外混合不同浓度舒芬太尼分娩镇痛时罗哌卡因的半数有效浓度[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(1):14-16. 被引量:27
  • 6陈满红,欧阳文,段开明,周昌菊,彭红婴.潜伏期分娩镇痛的可行性分析[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(8):698-699. 被引量:31

二级参考文献16

  • 1李仁淑,严相默.罗哌卡因硬膜外病人自控镇痛的无痛分娩效果及应激反应的研究[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2003,9(3):147-150. 被引量:17
  • 2吴贵龙,朋立超,蒋克泉,唐建国,管军华,朱烨黎,朱海红.硬膜外分娩镇痛对产妇血清泌乳素和新生儿神经行为的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(3):162-164. 被引量:29
  • 3黎尚荣,罗刚健,马武华,甘小亮,黑子清.自然分娩时不同浓度罗比卡因的硬膜外镇痛效应[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(6):383-385. 被引量:21
  • 4庄心良 曾因明 陈伯銮.现代麻醉学(第3版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.1956.
  • 5Lacassie HJ, Columb MO, Lacassie HP, et al. The relative motor blocking potencies of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine in labor.Anesth Analg, 2002, 95: 204-208.
  • 6McClellan KJ, Faulds D. Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia. Drugs, 2000, 60:1065-1093.
  • 7Debon R, Allaouchiche B, Duflo F, et al. The analgesic effect of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine 0.2% for labor analgesia: a comparison of three sufentanil doses. Anesth Analg, 2001, 92:180-183.
  • 8Polley LS, Columb MO, Nanghton NN, et al. Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor:implications for therapeutic indexes. Anesthesiology, 1999, 90: 944-950.
  • 9Dixon WJ, Massey FJ, eds. Introduction to statistical analysis. 4th edn.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983.428-439.
  • 10Nelson KE , Rauch T, Terebuh V, et al. A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology, 2002, 96:1070-1073.

共引文献93

同被引文献102

引证文献19

二级引证文献177

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部