摘要
日本与邻国中国、俄罗斯和韩国的领土主权争端都爆发于第二次世界大战之后,四国的领土争端存在类似性,如与历史主权、二战期间和战后的相关条约以及美国的积极干预密切相关,通过历史回顾及对条约的解读,以国际法的视角得出结论,日本企图以无主地先占或时效理由主张钓鱼台列屿的主权是无国际法根据的。
Japan and its neighbors China, Russia and South Korea's territorial sovereignty disputes broke out after World War H, their territorial sovereignty disputes exist similarity, such as history sovereignty, the relevant treaties during and after World War Ⅱ, and the intervention of United States, on the basis of interpretation of history and treaties, we known the conclusion from perspective of international law, there is no international legal basis for Japan attempting to get the sovereignty of Diaoyutai Islands.
出处
《东北亚论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期12-21,共10页
Northeast Asia Forum
基金
西北政法大学青年课题项目(06XJC007)
关键词
北方四岛
独岛
钓鱼台列屿
领土
先占
时效
无主地
Northern Territories
Dokdo
Diaoyutai Islands
Territory
occupation
prescription
Terra Nullius