期刊文献+

受工会影响的国际寡头竞争与环境倾销 被引量:10

Environmental Dumping and International Unionized Oligopolies
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在Barrett(1994)的模型中引入工会,研究环境倾销是否为稳健的战略性环境政策,得到的结论如下:第一,在企业进行产量竞争的情况下,环境倾销是本国政府的最优政策;并且,它的程度比不存在工会情况下的环境倾销程度更大。第二,在企业进行价格竞争的情况下,本国政府的最优环境政策取决于本国工会的工资议价能力和两个企业产品的差异程度的相互作用。一方面,只要本国工会的工资议价能力充分强,本国政府就会采取环境倾销政策。另一方面,给定本国工会具有工资议价能力,那么,只要两个企业产品的差异程度充分大,本国政府就会采取环境倾销政策。第三,以上讨论蕴含环境倾销可以成为对有工会的国际寡头竞争市场的稳健的战略性环境政策。 This paper studies whether environmental dumping is a robust environmental policy recommendation toward international unionized oligopolies. We introduce trade unions to Barrett (1994) model and show that: (i) When firms compete as Cournot competitors, govemments engage in environmental dumping policies; and the extent to which environmental taxes deviate from the Pivogian taxes is bigger than in the case where there do not exist trade unions. (ii) When firms compete as Bertrand competitors, optimal environmental policies are determined by the interaction between trade unions' bargaining strength and the degree of product differentiation. If trade union's bargaining strength is sufficient; or fixing trade unions' bargaining strength, if the degree of product differentiation is sufficient, governments engage in environmental dumping policies. (iii) These imply that environmental dumping could be a robust policy recommendation toward international unionized oligopolies.
作者 马捷 段颀
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期79-91,共13页 Economic Research Journal
关键词 战略性环境政策 有工会的国际寡头竞争 价格竞争 环境倾销政策 Environmental Dumping International Unionized Oligopolies
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Barrett, S., 1994,"Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade", Journal of Public Economics, vol. 54, pp. 325--338.
  • 2Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A. and Wolinsky, A., 1956, "The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modeling", Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 17, pp. 176--188.
  • 3Brander, J. A. and Krugman, P. ,1983, "A ‘Reciprocal Dumping' Model of International Trade", Journal of International Economics, vol. 15, pp. 313--321.
  • 4Brander, J. A. and Spencer, B. J., 1985, "Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry", Journal of International Economics, vol. 18, pp. 83--100.
  • 5Conrad, K., 1993, "Taxes and Subsidies for Pollution-Intensive Industries as Trade Policy", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 25, pp. 121--135.
  • 6Eerola, E., 2004, "Envlronmental Tax Competition in the Presence of Multinational Firms", International Tax and Public Finance, vol. 11, pp. 283--298.
  • 7Fredriksson, P. G. and Gaston, N., 1999, "The 'Greening' of Trade Unions and Demand for Eco-taxes', European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 15, pp. 663--686.
  • 8Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E., 1994, "Protection for Sale" ,American Economic Review, vol. 84, pp. 833--850.
  • 9Hamilton, S. F. and Requate, T., 2004, "Vertical Structure and Strategic Environmental Trade Policy", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 47, pp. 260--269.
  • 10Kennedy, P. W., 1994, "Equilibrium Pollution Taxes in Open Economies with Imperfect Competition", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 27, pp. 49--63.

同被引文献305

引证文献10

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部