期刊文献+

AMI急诊静脉内溶栓疗法应用延迟时间相关因素 被引量:2

STUDY ON THE INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS DELAY IN EMERGENCY PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性心肌梗死急诊静脉内溶栓疗法应用延迟时间的相关因素。方法对204例进行急诊静脉内溶栓治疗的急性心肌梗死病人的临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果本组204例中在院前和急诊科进行溶栓治疗者分别占11.3%和88.7%。全部病人总平均延迟时间为(203.1±92.9)min,其中进行院前溶栓的延迟时间明显短于在急诊科进行溶栓治疗者。溶栓治疗延迟时间与病人年龄呈正相关(r=0.308,P<0.05)。在发病后3h内进行溶栓的病人63例,其院内严重并发症的发生率低于3h后开始溶栓者(χ2=2.886,P<0.05)。结论急性心肌梗死急诊溶栓治疗的延迟时间与病人年龄及院内严重并发症的发生有一定的关系,院前进行溶栓治疗可显著缩短溶栓开始时间。 Objective To evaluate the related factors of intravenous thrombolysis treatment delay in the emergency patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Clinical data of 204 AMI patients received emergency intravenous thrombolysis therapy were analyzed retrospectively. Results In 204 patients reviewed, those received intravenous thrombolysis therapy before hospitalization accounted for 11.3%, while those received thrombolysis therapy in the emergency department accounted for 88.7%. The average delay time of therapy all the patients was (203. 1±92.9)min, in which, the delay of those underwent prehospital therapy was markedly shorter than those treated in emergency room. The deferred time of thrombolysis therapy was positively correlated with the patient's age (r=0. 308,P〈0.05). In 63 patients who received therapy within 3 h after the attack, whose severe complications were lower than those treated later than 3 h (χ^2 =2. 886,P〈0.05). Conclusion The delay of intravenous thrombolysis is correlated with the age and in-hospital severe complications in AMI patients, and prehosptial thrombolysis can dramatically shorten the delay.
出处 《齐鲁医学杂志》 2009年第3期258-260,共3页 Medical Journal of Qilu
基金 全军"十一五"医药卫生科研基金课题面上项目(2006MB262)
关键词 心肌梗死 急诊处理 血栓溶解疗法 时间 Myocardial infarction Emergency treatment, Thrombolytic therapy Time
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1黄先勇,孟庆义,沈洪,计达,钱远宇,王禹.急性心肌梗死静脉溶栓后即刻介入性治疗的评价[J].中国急救医学,2003,23(7):459-460. 被引量:5
  • 2孟庆义,杨晓秋,钱远宇,王志中,马勇,陈威.急性心肌梗死微血管阻塞时冠状动脉血流及肌酸激酶改变的研究[J].中国急救医学,2003,23(3):149-151. 被引量:7
  • 3HANSON T C,WILLIAMSON D.Identifying barriers to prehospital thrombolysis in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction[J].Emerg Med J,2006,23(8):650-653.
  • 4VERHEUGT F W,MONTALESCOT G,SABATINE M S,et al.Prehospital fibrinolysis with dual antiplatelet therapy in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction:a substudy of the randomized double blind CLARITY-TIMI 28 trial[J].J Thromb Thrombolysis,2007,23(3):173-179.
  • 5周晓彬,纪新强,徐莉.PPMS 1.5统计软件的功能及其应用[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2009,45(1):91-93. 被引量:284
  • 6LIEM S S,HOEVEN B L,OEMRAWSINGH P V,et al.Optimization of acute and chronic care for patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].Am Heart J,2007,153(1):11.
  • 7BRIGHT H,POCOCK J.Prehospital recognition of acute myocardial infarction[J].CJEM,2002,4(3):212-214.
  • 8BODEN W E,EAGLE K,GRANGER C B,et al.Reperfusion strategies in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:a comprehensive review of contemporary management options[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50(10):917-929.

二级参考文献10

  • 1钱远宇,孟庆义.老年人急性心肌梗死合并梗死区微血管阻塞的临床研究[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2002,1(1):23-26. 被引量:2
  • 2Veen G, De- Boer MJ, Zijlstra F,et al. Improvement in three - month angiographic outcome suggested after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction(Zwolle trial )compared with successful thrombolysis(APRICOT trial ). Antithrombotics in the prevention of reoccluson in coronary thrombolysis[J]. Am J Cardiol, 1999, 84(7) :763 - 767.
  • 3Zijlstra F, Hoomtje JC,de Boer MJ, et al. Long- term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl Med, 1999,341(9):1413- 1419.
  • 4Bimbaum Y, Goodman S, Barr A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis in patients with ST - segment elevation acute myocardial infraction and grade II and grade III myocardial ischemis on the enrollment electro cardio-gram [J] .Am J Cardiol,2001,88(8) :842 - 847.
  • 5The TIMI Research Group. Immediate vs delayed catheterization and angioplasty following thrombolytic therapy for acute infarction.TIMI II A Results[J]. JAMA, 1988,260:2849 - 2858.
  • 6Ellis SG, Da - Silva ER, Spaulding CM, et al. Review of immediate angioplasty after fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction:insights from the RESCUE I, RESCUE II, and other contemporary clinical experiences[J]. Am Heart J,2000,139(6) : 1046 - 1053.
  • 7Grech ED, Sutton AG, Campbell PG, et al. Resppraising the role of immediate intervention following thrombolytic recanalization in acute myocardial infusion[J]. Am J Cardiol, 2000,86(4) :400 - 405.
  • 8Ross AM, Lundergan CF, Rohrbeck SC, et al. Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolysis: technical and clinical outcomes in a large large thrombolysis trial.GUSTO- 1 Angiographic Investigators[J] .J Am Coll Cardiol, 1998,31(7):1511- 1517.
  • 9Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Greene RM, et al. Rescue argioplasty in the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI) 4 trial[ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 1997,80(1) :21 - 26.
  • 10孟庆义,沈洪.用酶峰时间聚类分析法判断急性心肌梗塞再灌注[J].河北医学,1999,5(5):9-11. 被引量:2

共引文献293

同被引文献19

  • 1Fang J, Alderman MH, Keenan NL, et al. Acute myocardial infarction hospitalization in the united states [ J ]. Am J Med, 2010 ; 123 ( 2 ) : 259-266.
  • 2Canadian cardiovascular society, American academy of family physicians, American college of cardiology, American heart association, 2007 focused update of the acc/aha,2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol , 2008:51(2) :210-247.
  • 3Liem SS, Hoeven BL, Oemrawsingh PV, et al. Optimization of acute and chronic care for patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Am Heart J,2007 ;153( 1 ) :11.
  • 4Pcat collaborators. Primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous shambolic therapy for acute myocardial in- farction: six month follow up and analysis of individual patient data form randomized trials [ J ]. Am heart J, 2003 ; 145( 1 ) :48-57.
  • 5Nissen SE. Brush JE Jr, Krumholz HM. President's page: gap-D 2 B : an alliance for quality [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2006 ;48(9) : 1911-1912.
  • 6D'souza SP, Mamas MA, Fraser DG, et al. Routine early coronary angioplasty versus ischemia-guided angioplasty after thrombolysis in acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction: a meta - analysis [ J]. Eur Heart J, 2011 ; 32 (8) :972-982.
  • 7Sanchez PL, Fernandez-aviles F. Routine early coronary angioplasty after thrombolysis in acute ST- elevation myocardial infarction:lysis is not the final step [ J ]. Eur Heart J,2011 ;32 ( 8 ) :927-930.
  • 8Wang YB, Fu XH, Wang XC, et al. Randomized comparison of radial versus femoral approach for patients with stemi undergoing early pci following intravenous thrombolysis [ J ]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2012 ; 24 ( 8 ) : 412-416.
  • 9丁颖铭.急救医疗一体化服务模式的探索[J].中华医院管理杂志,2008,24(8):542-543. 被引量:13
  • 10朱祥悌,田西奎,洪刚,张德河,邢云峰,李海春.急性心肌梗死院前与院内溶栓治疗的疗效比较[J].临床军医杂志,2008,36(5):682-683. 被引量:6

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部