摘要
尚秉和根据《焦氏易林》的有关说法和语音通假之例及爻位说,将《周易·明夷》六五爻辞中的"箕子"释为"孩子"并以为所指为纣;惠栋曾据汉人赵宾此"箕子当作荄茲"的说法来印证孟喜的卦气说。综合考察《明夷》卦爻辞和《彖》《象》二传的文义及文献相关记载,这些说法皆不能成立。
According to some interpretations related in Jiao shi yi lin (Jiao Gan's Yi Forest) , interchangeability of variant characters, as well as the hermeneutic approach by the line position, BB SHANG Bing-he regarded Jizi 箕子 in the fifth line statements of Hexagram Mingyi ( hexagram 36 in the received version of the Zhouyi) as Haizi 孩子(lit., child) which alludes tyrant Zhou 纣. And HUI Dong of the Qing dynasty drew the Han dynasty ZHAO Bin's interpretation of it as Gaizi 荄茲 to attest to MENG Xi's gua-qi theory which correlates the hexagrams and lines to seasonal points. Through a comprehensive examination of the statements to Hexagram Mingyi and its lines and the commentaries of the Tuan (Judgment) and Xiang (Image) as well as literal records related, it can be seen that all the above assertions can not stand.
出处
《古籍整理研究学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期1-4,共4页
Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies
关键词
周易
明夷
箕子
Zhouyi
hexagram Mingyi
Jizi