期刊文献+

当前我国体育学学科评估存在的问题 被引量:5

Thoughts about the current evaluation of the science of physical education discipline in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对高等学校与科研院所学位与研究生教育评估所、中国网大、武汉大学科学评价研究中心和广东管理科学院科学学研究所4家社会组织和研究机构关于我国体育学学科评估(排名)结果的研究,指出当前的学科评估存在的问题:评估的目的不同、评估理论研究不足、没有针对性的评估指标体系、体育学科的不同层次采用相同的评估指标体系;参评的对象与评估结果代表性不足;评估结果起伏较大;每年一轮的评估不符合学科建设与发展的规律。 By studying the evaluation (rating) of the science of physical education discipline carried out in China by such 4 social organizations and research institutes as Higher Learning and Research Institute Degree and Graduate Education Evaluation Institute, China Network University, Science Evaluation Research Center of Wuhan University, and Science Research Institute of Guangdong Management Science Institute, the author pointed out the following problems existing in current disciplinary evaluation: the evaluation organizations have different purposes for the evaluation of the physical education discipline; the evaluation organizations have done inadequate researches on theories about disciplinary evaluation; there is not an evaluation index system established specifically for the evaluation of the physical education discipline; the same evaluation index system is used for different levels of the physical education discipline; the objects and results of the evaluation of the physical education discipline is not adequately representative; the results of the evolution (rating) of the physical education discipline vary greatly; the yearly evaluation is not in conformity with the pattern of disciplinary construction and development.
作者 李慧林
出处 《体育学刊》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期49-52,共4页 Journal of Physical Education
基金 2008年河南省教育厅骨干教师资助项目
关键词 体育学科 学科评估 中国 physical education discipline disciplinary evaluation China
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献62

  • 1杨孟,郭新立.加强学科建设和评估培养高质量人才——“中英高等学校学科评估研讨会”综述[J].学位与研究生教育,1997(2):15-16. 被引量:5
  • 2潘懋元.一流大学与排行榜[J].求是,2002(5):57-58. 被引量:44
  • 3王冀生.学校、社会、政府在高等教育评估中的地位、作用[J].中国高教研究,1996(2):14-16. 被引量:15
  • 4Astin, A.W.. Achieving Educational Excellence [ M ].San Francisco: Jossev-Bass, 1985.
  • 5Ontario Council on University Affairs. Report on an Assessment of the Appraisals Process [ R ]. Toronto : Ontario Council on University Affairs, 1986.
  • 6Yeates, M.. Programme Planning Models and the Current Situation in Ontario. A Discussion Paper by the Executive Vice-Chairman, Ontario Council on Graduate Studies, presented at the Conference on Graduate Planning, Millcroft Inn, Ontario, April 23, 1987.
  • 7Bercuson, D.J., R. Bothwell and J.L. Granatstein. The Great Brain Robbery: Canada' s Universities on the Road to Ruin [ M ] . Toronto: McClelland and Stewart,1984.
  • 8Bleything, W. B.. On the Workload of Faculty: Defining Faculty Workload [ J ]. Journal of Optometric Education,1982,(8): 7- 12.
  • 9Judge, H.. American Graduate Schools of Education[M]. New York: Ford Foundation, 1982.
  • 10Hunt, D.E.. Beginning with Ourselves: In Practice, Theory, and Human Affairs [ M ]. Cambridge, Mass. : Brookline Books, 1987.

共引文献65

同被引文献82

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部