期刊文献+

液基细胞学和高危人乳头瘤状病毒DNA检测对宫颈病变筛查的价值 被引量:7

The Value of Thinprep Cytologic Test and High-risk HPV DNA Testing on Screening for Cervical Lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨液基细胞学(TCT)和高危人乳头瘤状病毒DNA(HR-HPV DNA)检测对宫颈病变筛查的价值。方法对南昌大学第二附属医院妇科门诊1682例宫颈炎患者进行TCT检查,并对其中TCT检查结果异常的患者行HR-HPV DNA检测。结果1682例患者TCT检查结果异常者158例,占9.39%,其中不典型鳞状细胞和腺细胞病变(ASC-US)63例(3.75%),低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)44例(2.61%),高度鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)45例(2.67%),鳞状上皮细胞癌(SCC)6例(0.36%)。158例TCT检查异常者HR-HPV DNA检测阳性85例,阳性率53.78%;HR-HPV DNA阳性率分布为:ASC-US23.81%(15/63)、LSIL65.90%(29/44)、HSIL77.77%(35/45)、SCC100.00%(6/6),阳性率随宫颈病变级别升高而升高。结论TCT和HR-HPV DNA检查是筛查宫颈癌前病变的有效方法,二者结合有利于提高宫颈癌及癌前病变的检出率。 Objective To explore the value of thinprep cytologic test(TCT)and high-risk hu- man papillomavirus DNA (HR-HPV DNA) detection of cervical disease screening. Methods Of the second affiliated hospital of nanchang university, 1 682 cases of out-patient gynecological patients with cervicitis TCT inspection, and one of TCT in patients with abnornal test abnormal test results for HR-HPV DNA testing. Results In the 1 682 patients,158 cases showed abnormal results for TCT,accounting for 9.39% ,ASC-US 63 cases (3.75%) ,LSIL 44 cases (9.61%) ,HSIL 45 cases (2.67%), SCC 6 cases (0. 36 percent). In 158 patients with abnormal cytology, there were 85 showing HR-HPV DNA testing positive,the positive rate was 53.78%, HR-HPV DNA positive rate for distribution:ASC-US 23.81% (15/63),LSIL 65.90 % (29/44), HSIL 77.77% (35/45) ,SCC 100.00%(6/6). HR-HPV DNA positive rate of cervical lesions with high-level and higher. Conclusion TCT and HR-HPV DNA screening for cervical cancer screening may be an effective way to precancerous lesions, the combination will help improve cervical cancer and precancerous lesion detection rate.
出处 《江西医学院学报》 CAS 2009年第2期112-113,115,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Jiangxi
关键词 液基细胞学 宫颈癌 筛查 人乳头瘤状病毒 thinprep cytologic test cervical cancer screening HPV
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1李洁,刘宝印,zur Hausen H,王宏,杨学志,李力,刘文,刘洪隐,陆克昭,刘旭,牛春燕,裴润芳,苏钟浦,王言贵,董继华,张桂宁,刘春杰,许吉林,林毓纯.中国妇女宫颈癌组织中人乳头瘤病毒感染及其地理分布的调查[J].中华实验和临床病毒学杂志,1996,10(1):50-55. 被引量:67
  • 2[1]Parkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J,et al.Estimating the world cancer burden:globocan 2000.Int J cancer,2001,94:153-1562.
  • 3[2]Lee KB,Ashfaq R,Birdsong GC,et al.Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based thin-layer system for cervical cancer sacaning.Obstet Gynecol,1997,90:278-284.
  • 4[4]Lonky NM,Sadeghi M,Tsadik GW,et al.The clinical significance of the poor correlation of cervical dysplasia and cervical malignancy with referral cytologic results.Am J Obstet Gynecol,1999,181:560-566.
  • 5[6]Clavel C,Masure M,Bory JP,et al.Hybrid capture II-based human papillomavirus detection,a sensitive test to detect in routine highgrade cervical lesions:a preliminary study on 1518 women.British J Cancer,1999,80:1306-1311.
  • 6[8]Schiffman MH,Bauer HM,Hoover RN,et al.Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.J Natl Cancer Inst,1993,85:958-962.
  • 7Belinson J,Int J Gynecol Cancer,1999年,9卷,411页
  • 8李洁,中华实验和临床簿学杂志,1996年,10卷,50页
  • 9Peng H,Int J Cancer,1991年,47卷,711页
  • 10Frable WJ,Austin RM,Collins RJ,et al.Medicolegal affairs:IAC task force summary.Acta Cytol,1998,42(1):76-119

共引文献1149

同被引文献47

引证文献7

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部