摘要
汉魏六朝时期老学空前繁荣,出现了大量老学作品。本文以王重民和严灵峰所作老学目录为基础,对二者进行了比较,概述了这一时期老学作品数量大、研究形式多样化、研究阶层广泛、老学影响深远等基本特征,并对五斗米道系《想尔注》和张陵《老子注》和是否同书异名、僧肇《老子注》的真伪等问题进行了进一步研究。
Form Han Danasty to the Six Danasties, Laoxue obtained an unprecedented prosperity. Based on the two catalogues of Laots that Wang - chongmin and Yan - lingfeng made, this essay summarized some characteristics of the development of Laoxue in this period, such as the big amount of writings about Laots, the far - ranging of researching people, the far - reaching of Laoxue and so on.. This essay also made a farther study on two questions: whether or not wudoumitao's xiangerzhu and zhangling's laotszhu were the same books that with two different tides, and whether or not sengzhao's laotszhu was pseudo.
出处
《湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2009年第3期84-88,共5页
Journal of Hubei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
老子
文献
想尔注
老子注
Laots
writing
Xiangerzhu
laotszhu