摘要
二宫尊德与大原幽学同为日本江户时代后期的著名思想家,两者在伦理思想方面既有相似点,更富差异性。二者似乎都强调‘安分守度’,但是大原幽学从武士的立场、政治的角度,过分强调封建身份制,他的思想最终没能走出封建武士伦理之藩篱;而二宫尊德始终站在农民的立场,从实际出发,为农民着想。二宫尊德主张道德与经济的协调发展,他思想中的社会公益性、社会协调性的特征明显。二者相比较,二宫尊德的思想不仅顺应了当时历史之潮流,而且于当今社会也具有积极的现实意义。
Ninomiya Sontoku and Ohara Yugaku were two well-known thinkers in the late Edo period. They shared something in common ideologically and ethically as well as differences. Both seemed to emphasize the "law-abiding", but Ohara Yugaku stressed too much on the identity of the feudal system from the samurai and political point of view, while Ninomiya Sontoku stood on the position of farmers, advocating the coordinating development of morality and economy. Comparatively speaking, Ninomiya Sontoku's thinking not only conforms to the trend of history, but also has positive and practical significance to the modem society.
出处
《广东外语外贸大学学报》
2009年第3期67-70,共4页
Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
关键词
二宫尊德
大原幽学
思想
比较
Ninomiya Sontokn
Ohara Yugaku
thinking
comparison