期刊文献+

全球化下专利权滥用的规制模式 被引量:3

Regulation mode to patent abuse in situation of globalization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全球化背景下,专利权滥用行为问题日益突出,对于专利权滥用行为进行规制已为各国所重视。基于反垄断原理建立的制度确定性较好,但证明程度要求较高、范围有限,而专利权滥用原理基于衡平法原则,具有较大的弹性,范围涵盖全面,但其确定性不足。结合经济全球化下日益激烈的知识产权竞争以及中国目前所处的不利地位,建立二元制的规制模式,进行模式互补是中国合理规制专利滥用行为的必然选择。 The issue of the abuse of patent right has been more and more obvious in the situation of globalization. The regularization against the patent abuse has also been paid attention to by a lot of countries. The system based on antitrust principle has a good certainty, but has a limited range and a high requirement for testification level yet. On the other hand, the patent abuse principle which is from equality principle has relatively good elasticity and extensive range, but also has a insufficient certainty. It is the best choice to set a dual mode of regulation to complement exeeUent mode considering the increasingly fierce competition and the disadvantageous situation of China under the globalization.
作者 杨异 王辉
出处 《大连海事大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第3期74-77,共4页 Journal of Dalian Maritime University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 专利权滥用 规制模式 二元制 patent abuse mode of legal regulation dual mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1肖黎明.跨国公司滥用知识产权将被反垄断法规制[J].法人,2008(8):52-54. 被引量:1
  • 2郭禾,金武卫.专利权滥用的专利法规制[M]//国家知识产权局条法司.《专利法》及 《专利法实施细则》第三次修改专题研究报告(中卷).北京:知识产权出版社,2006:458.
  • 3富田彻男.市场竞争中的知识产权[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004:365.
  • 4TOSHIKO Takenaka.TI's Kilby patent was found to be invalid and thus unenforceable[J].CASRIP Newsletter-Fall,1997,4(3):22-24.
  • 5张伟君,单晓光.滥用专利权与滥用专利制度之辨析——从日本“专利滥用”的理论与实践谈起[J].知识产权,2006,16(6):67-70. 被引量:23
  • 6北京市高级人民法院知识产权庭.知识产权诉讼事务研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2008:263.
  • 7罗伯特·P·墨杰斯,彼特·S·迈乃尔,马克·A·莱姆利,等.新技术时代的知识产权法[M].齐筠,张清,彭霞,等,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003:324.

二级参考文献20

  • 1梁熙艳.权利之限:侵权审理法院能否直接裁决专利权的有效性——析日本最高裁判所的“Kilby第275号专利上告审判决”及影响[J].知识产权,2005,15(4):58-63. 被引量:17
  • 2程永順.專利法實施中幾個問題的思考[J].中国专利与商标,2006(1):3-9. 被引量:1
  • 3To Promote Innovation:The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and.Policy,A Report by the Federal Trade Commission,Oct.2003.at 7-15.
  • 4Toshiko Takenaka,TI's Kilby Patent was Found to be Invalid and thus Unenforceable,CASRIP Newsletter-Fall 1997,Volume 4,Issue 3.
  • 5Hiroe and Associates,A Tornado is Building Up in Japan's IP Litigation,July 14,2003,http://www.hiroe.co.jp/en/others/kilby_e.pdf.
  • 6Gary L.Reback,Patently Absurd:Too many patents are just as bad for society as too few.06.24.2002,http://www.forbes.com/asap/2002/0624/044.html.Khalid,Patently Absurd:How RIM vs.NTP Uncovers Patent System Abuse,2006/01/29-21:07.http://baheyeldin.com/technology/technology-in-society/patently-absurd-how-rim-vs-ntp-uncovers-patent-system-abuse.html.
  • 7Julie E.Cohen,REVERSE ENGINEERING AND THE RISE OF ELECTRONIC VIGILANTISM:INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IMPLICATIONS OF "LOCK-OUT" PROGRAMS,68 S.Cal.L.Rev.1091(1995),at 1178.
  • 8Jay P.Kesan,A comparative appraisal of patent invalidation process in Japan,日本特许厅委托平成15年度产业财产权研究推进事业报告书,2004年3月,日本知识产权研究所出版.
  • 9Robert P.Merges,AS MANY AS SIX IMPOSSIBLE PATENTS BEFORE BREAKFAST:PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR BUSINESS CONCEPTS AND PATENT SYSTEM REFORM,14 Berkeley Tech.L.J.577 (1999),at595.
  • 10To Promote Innovation:The Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and.Policy,A Report by the Federal Trade Commission,Oct.2003.at 5,注释16.

共引文献30

同被引文献22

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部