3Giorgi,L.& Pianesi,F.Tense and aspect:from semantics to morphosyntax[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1997.
4Liszka,S.Exploring the effects of first language influence on second language pragmatic process deficit perspective[J].Second Language Research,2004 (20):212-231.
6Zegarac,V.Relevance Theory and the in second language acquisition[J].Second Language Research,2004 (20):193-211.
7Trenki?,D.Form-meaning connections in the acquisition of English articles[A].In Foster-Cohen,S.,Ruthenberg,T.& Poschen,M.(eds.).European Second Language Association Yearbook:Volume 2[C].Amsterdam:John Benjamins,2002,115-133.
8Birner,B.& Ward,G.Information Status and Noncanonical Word Order[M].Amsterdam; John Benjamins,1998.
5Blakemom, D. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning : The Se mantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers [ M ]. Cam bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
6Blakemore, D. What are discourse markers [J]. Journal of Pragnmatic, 1999, 31 : 931 -952.
7de Paiva, B. M.M. Pragmatic interaction in a second lan guage [ C ] //C. B. Grant. Rethinking Communicative Inter action : New Interdisciplinary Horizons. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2003 : 187 206.
8Foster-Cohen, S.H. Relevance Theory in first and second language acquisition [ R ]Paper Presented at the AAAL Conference in Vancouver, CA, March 11th--14th, 2000a.
9Foster-Cohen, S. H. Relevance Theory and language acqui sitionA productive paradigm shift? [J]. Child Language Bulletin, 2000b, 20:5 -8.
10Foster-Cohen, S.H. Relevance Theory and second lan guage learning/behavior [ J ]. Second Language Research, 2004a, 20 (3) : 189 192.
