期刊文献+

吸收能力、知识整合与组织知识及技术转移绩效的关系研究 被引量:15

The Relationship among Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Integration, Organizational Knowledge and Technology Transfer Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在科技、经济全球化与知识经济的背景下,技术转移已成为推动技术创新和技术进步的重要手段。以珠三角地区102家高科技企业作为实证对象,探讨吸收能力、知识整合对组织知识与转移绩效的影响关系。实证结果表明:(1)吸收能力对知识整合有显著的正向影响;(2)吸收能力对组织知识没有显著的正向影响;(3)知识整合对组织知识有显著的正向影响;(4)吸收能力对技术转移绩效有显著的正向影响;(5)知识整合对技术转移绩效有显著的正向影响;(6)组织知识对技术转移绩效有显著的正向影响。最后,探讨了本研究的理论与实践意义,并提出在管理实践上的若干建议。 In the context of globalization of science & technology, economy, and as well as knowledge economy, technology transfer is becoming the important means for the innovation and the progress of technology. Base on 102 samples from the Pearl River Delta of China, this paper investigates the relationship among absorptive capacity, knowledge integration and the organizational knowledge and technology transfer performance. The result shows that: (1) Absorptive capacity has positive impact on Knowledge Integration, (2) Absorptive Capacity has no positive impact on organizational knowledge, (3) Knowledge integration has positive impact on organizational knowledge, (4) Absorptive capacity has positive impact on technology transfer performance, (5) Knowledge integration has positive impact on technology transfer performance and, (6) the Organizational knowledge has positive impact on technology transfer performance. Moreover, we discuss implications of this research in both theory and practice, and also put out some suggestions for management practice.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期81-86,共6页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70872030) 广东省软科学研究计划项目(2008B070800013) 广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(06JDXM63003)
关键词 吸收能力 知识整合 组织知识 技术转移绩效 absorptive capacity knowledge integration organizational knowledge technology transfer performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1薛澜,沈群红.科技全球化及其对中国科技发展的政策涵义[J].世界经济,2001,24(10):57-62. 被引量:18
  • 2Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.
  • 3Garud, R., Nayyar, P.R. Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(5): 365-386.
  • 4Grant, R.M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration[J]. Organization Science, 1996, 7(4): 375-388.
  • 5Makhija, M.V., Ganesh, U. The relationship between control and partner learning-related joint ventures[J]. Organization Science, 1997, 8(5): 508-527.
  • 6Dyer, J.H., Singh, H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advan- tage[J]. Academy of management review, 1998, 23:660-679.
  • 7Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N. SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation[J]. Long Rang Planning, 2000, 33(1): 5-34.
  • 8Lorenzoni, G., Lipparini, A. The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: A logitudinal study[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(4): 317-338.
  • 9Teece, D., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. Dynamic capability and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18 (7): 509-533.
  • 10Tsai, W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.

二级参考文献2

共引文献17

同被引文献218

引证文献15

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部