期刊文献+

关联交易、代理冲突与中小投资者保护 被引量:13

Related-party Transaction,Agency Conflicts,and Minority Investor Protection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文全面分析了2002-2006年间我国上市公司关联交易总体状况,证明了非公允关联交易与上市公司价值之间具有负相关关系。在此基础上,以非公允关联交易的规模作为中小投资者受侵害程度的代理变量,分析了股权结构、"自我约束"机制以及法治环境对于中小投资者保护的影响。实证结果表明,关联交易的发生规模与第一大股东持股比例正相关,与股权制衡能力负相关,中小投资者因上市公司的"政治关系"而受损;境外交叉上市、聘请外部董事的"自我约束"机制以及法治环境的改善、市场化进程的加快可以有效约束控股股东对于中小投资者的掠夺。 Based on analyzing related-party transactions of Chinese listed firms during the period of 2002-2006, this paper finds that the potentially harmful related-party transactions is negatively correlated with listed company' s Tobin' s Q. Using the value of a firm' s potentially harmful related-party transactions as a proxy for the degree of expropriation, we analyzes the effects of ownership structure, bonding mechanism and law environment on minority investor protection. The empirical study finds that the scale of related-party transactions is positively correlated with the share proportion controlled by the largest shareholder and negatively correlated with counter-balance towards the largest shareholder. Minority investors suffer form listed companies' political connections. The bonding practices including listing the companies in foreign stock exchanges, having outside directors and increasing proportion of fixed assets, as well as improving law environment and promoting commercialization process could restrain the controlling shareholders' expropriation of minority investors.
出处 《证券市场导报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期55-63,共9页 Securities Market Herald
关键词 关联交易 代理冲突 股权结构 法制环境 中小投资者保护 Related-party Transaction, Agency Conflicts, Ownership Structure, Law Environment, Minority Investor Protection
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Art Durnev, Larry Fauver. Stealing from Thieves: Firm Governance and Performance when States are Predatory[Z]. SSRN Working paper, 2007.
  • 2Cheung, Y-L., L. Jing, FZ. Rau, and A. Stouraitis. How does the grabbing hand grab? Tunneling assets from Chinese listed companies to the state[Z], working paper, Purdue University, 2007.
  • 3Claessens, S., and L. Laeven,. Financial development, property rights, and growth[J]. Journal of Fioance, 2003,(58): 2401-2436.
  • 4Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Lang, L, .The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, (58):81-112.
  • 5Delios, A., Wu, Z., Zhou, N. A New Perspective on Ownership Identities in China' s Listed Companies[J] .Management and Organization Review , 2006, 2, 319-343.
  • 6Hua Cai. Bonding, Law Enforcement and Corporate Governance in China[J]. Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, 2007 Fall Issue.
  • 7Coffee Jr. Privatization and corporate governance: the lessons from securities market failure[Z]. Columbia Law School Working Paper No. 158, 1999.
  • 8Coffee Jr. The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Role of Law in the Separation of Ownership and Control [Z].Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 182,2001.
  • 9Klapper, L., and I. Love. Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance inemerging markets[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2002,(10): 703-728.
  • 10La Porta,Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Salines,Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny.Legal Determinants of External Finance[J]. Journal of Finance,1997,53(1):1 131 - 1150,41.

二级参考文献140

共引文献1988

同被引文献182

引证文献13

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部