中国城市幼儿情绪及社会性发展量表标准化的信度和效度分析

Reliability and validity of standardized chinese version of urban infant-toddler Social and Emotional Assessment(CITSEA) scale

[目的]评价修订版《中国城市幼儿情绪及社会性评估量表》的信度和效度。[方法]通过分层随机整群抽样的方法，抽取全国七大区域14个城市的5323名12-36月龄健康幼儿作为研究对象，由经过全国统一培训的调查员对研究对象的主要照顾者进行现场问卷调查。调查工具包括儿童一般情况调查表、1～3岁幼儿气质问卷、2～3岁儿童行为量表和中国城市幼儿情绪及社会性评估量表。[结果]量表具有较好的测量学特性：四个域两周重测信度为0．78～0．86，分半信度0．82～0．90，Cronbach-α系数为0．79～0．88；问题域得分与CBCL六个行为因子显著正相关，能力域则相反；确定性因子分析显示，除了感官敏感性维度外，模型拟合参数指标均在理想范围之内（GFI，AGFI，NFI，NNFI，CFI均〉0．90，RMRSE〈0．10，RMR（0．04），说明量表结构划分能较好地拟合样本数据。[结论]修订后的量表，具有良好的信度和效度，可用于中国城市幼儿情绪和社会性发展状况的评估及问题筛查。

[Objective] To evaluate the reliability and validity of standardized Chinese version of Urban Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment （CITSEA）. [Methods] A formal survey was carried out using a stratified cluster sampling scheme, involving 14 cities in the 7 administrative districts in China; a total of 5 323 healthy toddlers aged 12-36 months were involved. Parents of the study children were interviewed by the consistently trained interviewers with a serial of questionnaires （general status of children, Chinese temperament Scale for toddlers, Children Behavioral Checklist aged 2-3 years and the Social-Emotional screening assessment for the aged of 12-36 months. [Results] CITSEA was proved to have good psychometrics property. The within-2-week test-retest reliability and the split-half reliability for the four domains were shown to be 0.78-0.86 and 0. 82-0.90 respectively, with the Cronbach-α coefficient being 0.79-0.88. The confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fitness for most models （GFI, AGFI, NFI, NNFI, and CFI all greater than 0.90, RMRSE〈0. 10, and RMR〈0.04）. These fitness statistics indicate that the structuring of the assessment tools fit the sample data well. [Conclusions] The CITSEA has good validity and reliability with good representativeness of the norm. It can be used as screening tools for emotional and social development in children in Chinese cities.