期刊文献+

基于失真模型的结构相似度图像质量评价 被引量:7

Structural similarity image quality assessment based on distortion model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 提出了一种基于图像失真模型及失真视觉特性的图像质量评价方法,解决了传统结构相似度(SSIM)度量不能同时有效评价不同失真强度与不同失真类型图像质量的问题.将图像失真分解为局部线性模糊及加性噪声,通过质量敏感区域加权与噪声SSIM补偿,实现各种失真类型SSIM的聚合以提高综合评价性能.实验结果表明,这种基于失真模型的区域加权SSIM能够一致评价各种失真类型、各种失真强度的图像质量,在LIVE图库上与主观评价分回归后的相关系数达到0.946 7,优于其他SSIM算法. This work proposed a new structural similarity (SSIM) method, which is adapted for assessing images of different distortion types and different distortion intensities. The new method models a distorted image as an original image that subjects to linear frequency distortion (LFD) and additive noise injection (NI). LFD is local, and the SSlM of this type can be clustered by being weighted on quality sensitive regions. NI is uncorrelated with the original image, and the image quality of this type is underestimated by SSIM. So quality compensation is used to unify SSIM metric of these two types. Finally, the new method was validated with subjective quality scores on LIVE database which containing 982 images. Experimental results showed that the performance of the new method is comparable with the art-of-the-state objective methods.
出处 《浙江大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期864-868,共5页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science
关键词 结构相似度(SSIM) 图像质量评价 图像失真模型 人类视觉系统(HVS) structural similarity (SSIM) image quality assessment image distortion model human vision system (HVS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1GIROD B. "What's wrong with mean-squared error?" in digital images and human vision [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993:207-220.
  • 2WANG Z, BOVIK A C, LU L G. Why is image quality assessment so difficult Cc]// Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Orlando: IEEE, 2002, 4:3313-3316.
  • 3MANNOS J L, SAKRISON D J. The effects of a visual fi delity criterion on the encoding of images [J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1974, IT-4:525-536.
  • 4WATSON A B, YANG G Y, SOLOMON J A, et al. Visibility of wavelet quantization noise [J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1997, 6(8) : 1164 - 1175.
  • 5WANG Z, BOVIK A C, SHEIKH H R, et al. Image quality assessment: from error measurement to structural similarity [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600-612.
  • 6SHEIKH H R, BOVIK A C, VECIANA G D. An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2005, 14(12): 2117-2128.
  • 7SHEIKH H R, BOVIK A C. Image information and visual quality [J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(2): 430-444.
  • 8WANG Z, SIMONCILLI E P, BOVIK A C. Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment [C] // IEEE Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. Asilomar: IEEE, 2003, 2: 1398-1402.
  • 9BANHAM M R, KATSAGGELOS A K. Digital image restoration [J].IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 1997, 14(2) : 24 - 41.
  • 10DA CUNHA A L, ZHOU J, DO M N. The nonsub- sampled Contourlet transform: theory, design, and applications [J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(10) : 3089 - 3101.

同被引文献65

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部