摘要
在刑法解释目标上,主观解释论虽然对于维护刑法的权威性至关重要,但它不仅不利于国家刑事制定法与民族习惯法之间的良性互动,反而会加剧二者之间的冲突;客观解释论虽然可能使刑法解释偏离刑法立法,进而削弱刑法立法对刑法司法的制约,但对国家刑事制定法与民族习惯法之间的良性互动大有裨益。因而,就具有丰富的民族习惯法实践且法治贫困的我国民族地区的刑事法治发展而言,在刑法解释目标上应当坚持"客观解释论为主,主观解释论为辅"的综合解释论。
On the interpretative target of criminal law, the subjective interpretive theory is very important to maintaining authority of criminal law, but it has disadvantage to interaction between criminal statute and minority's custom law, and on the contrary, makes criminal statute conflict with minority's custom law. The objective interpretative theory can make criminal interpretation deviate from criminal legislation probably, weaken the restriction to criminal justice from criminal legislation furthermore, but it has great advantage to the good interaction between criminal statute and minority's custom law. Therefore, as the area of minorities with abundant minority' s custom law and poverty of rule of law is concerned, the compromise interpretive theory "giving attention to objective interpretive theory mainly and subjective interpretive theory secondarily" should be established on the interpretative target.
出处
《河南公安高等专科学校学报》
2009年第3期20-24,共5页
Journal of Henan Public Security Academy
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"青藏高原地区刑事法治发展制约因素及解决机制研究"(08XFX019)的阶段性成果之一
关键词
刑法解释目标
主观解释论
客观解释论
综合解释论
The interpretative target
Subjective interpretative theory
Objective interpretative theory
Compromise interpretive theory